Japanese scholar Kenichi Ohmae recently predicted in his new book -- The Emergence of the United States of Chunghwa -- that Taiwan and China are likely to unify under a federal system in 2005 as a result of economic integration. Gordon Chang (
After visits by the two renowned China experts to Taiwan in early April, Mainland Affairs Council Chairwoman Tsai Ing-wen (
In fact, in view of the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), a dangerous risk still exists in today's China -- the risk of government inefficiency, a problem which is widespread in developing countries. In the face of globalization, a "borderless era," on which Ohmae places great stress, is beginning to take shape. A regional incident could become a significant international issue in an instant. A minor mistake made by an inefficient government could lead to a huge, global catastrophe.
In contrast, all the SARS patients in Taiwan have gradually recovered from the disease. The high quality of Taiwan's medical treatment is self-evident and has been much more successful than that in China or Hong Kong.
The nation is also about to export the "Taiwan experience" to the international community. The World Health Organization (WHO) may have to allow the country to join the organization for the sake of global SARS prevention work.
So, although Taiwan has been affected by the SARS outbreak, it has now become a true beneficiary of the crisis. This makes us realize that it's impossible to predict everything.
But international investment will not flood Taiwan just because of the way it handled this crisis, and foreign countries will not withdraw their investment from China overnight. Taiwanese businesspeople may still have to take China's market as the starting point on their path to globalization. Even if their investments in China are profitable, however, they should not take the Chinese market as both the starting point and the finishing point of the process of globalization. It's certainly OK for the government to remind us frequently about the risks in China. But it should never forget to carry out its own policy of "active opening, effective management" -- so that Taiwanese businesspeople in China can also have a chance to invest in Taiwan in the future.
Tu Jenn-hwa is a professor in the Graduate Institute of National Development at National Taiwan University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing