An atypical pneumonia outbreak has been spreading with alarming speed across the world. So far more than 150 cases have been reported in Asia, America and Europe and at least nine deaths have been attributed to the outbreak. WHO officials yesterday called the mystery pneumonia that appeared in China "a new communicable disease" but said there was still no link to cases in other countries. However, the global alert issued by the WHO lists China, Vietnam, Hong Kong, Indonesia, the Philippines and Thailand as affected areas.
Taiwan is not on the list, but at least three cases have been discovered here -- and reported to the WHO. Political factors mean that Taiwan has "disappeared" from the global epidemic prevention system. Such action is not only unfair, it is downright dangerous in that it may keep people visiting or transiting this nation in the dark about the situation here.
Taiwan is not a member of the WHO -- owing to Beijing's blacklisting -- and is therefore excluded from the WHO's daily and emergency operations. Back in 1998, 80 people died during an outbreak of an enterovirus here. The WHO did not respond to Taipei's calls for help although the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (USCDC) stepped in and provided some assistance.
By excluding Taiwan for political reasons, the WHO has not only violated the rights of 23 million Taiwanese to medical service, it has also created a blind spot in the global health and disease prevention network -- a rather serious matter in this era, in which what happens in any part of the world is having an increasingly bigger impact on the rest.
With the pneumonia outbreak, the WHO has been quick to ask the USCDC to help Taiwan. The WHO has apparently improved the way it handles Taipei, but discrimination still remains. And discrimination contravenes the WHO's mission. The right to medical service transcends national boundaries and political battle lines. The US House of Representatives and the European Parliament have both passed resolutions supporting this nation's's participation in the WHO.
The government has been working hard in recent years to push a WHO-membership bid but to no avail, thanks to Beijing. The atypical pneumonia outbreak appears to have started last November in Guangdong Province and gradually spread to Hong Kong and then elsewhere. In the cases that have been reportedly locally, the people apparently came in contact with the virus in China.
A thriving trade in smuggled livestock from across the Taiwan Strait means that large numbers of animals raised in China enter Taiwan without undergoing proper health checks. Foot-and-mouth disease outbreaks originating from China have already caused massive losses to the nation's livestock industry.
The impression that vicious Chinese diseases are flowing into this country at a time when Taiwanese capital is pouring into the other side has resulted in negative public perceptions about China. The Department of Health has already advised the public not to visit China and Hong Kong. The number of Taiwanese heading to those places is already falling, but people who work or run businesses there have no choice but to go.
A Beijing leader who has any insight and generosity will stop interfering in Taipei's efforts to participate in the WHO because this will certainly improve China's bad image here. Taiwan's participation in the WHO should not have anything to do with politics. It could only improve people's welfare on both sides of the Taiwan Strait. If Beijing stubbornly continues to block Taiwan's path into the WHO, then more and more Taiwanese will keep China out of their hearts.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath