Perhaps it takes an ex-KGB spy for a Kremlin ruler to play diplomatic poker with skill. Indeed, Russian President Vladimir Putin shows as much mastery at international diplomacy as he does in handling Russian domestic affairs. Not since Gustav Stresemann, Weimar Germany's foreign minister, played the Soviet Union and the West off against each other, has a leader with so weak a hand played his cards so effectively. Putin's latest moves in North Korea, and his careful tap-dance over Iraq, are just the latest examples.
Diplomacy, in its traditional form, was never Russia's strong suit. Under the czars, Russia was often isolated. Even when part of alliances -- the Triple Alliance with Bismarck's Germany and the Habsburg Empire, or the Entente with France before the World War I -- Russia was kept at a distance.
Russian leaders typically dealt with their fear of isolation -- and encirclement -- by going out of their way to appear threatening. In the Soviet era, the distances between Russia and its neighbors became unbridgeable chasms, with the USSR ringed either by hostile states or weak, servile ones.
Not until former president Boris Yeltsin did Russia make its first steps to bridge these divides. But Yeltsin could never get over Russia's lost superpower status; his periodic growls to assert Russia's wounded pride ultimately made him seem unreliable. True, his democratic Russia was permitted some role in global diplomacy. In Yugoslavia, former Russian premier Victor Chernomyrdin joined Finnish president Matti Ahtissari in resolving the Kosovo crisis of 1999. But this hardly amounted to recognition of Russia's indispensability -- after all, NATO troops entered Kosovo without Russian consent.
A realist in his bones, Putin recognizes Russia's changed status. But this recognition is not a confession of weakness; instead, it reflects his clear-sighted analysis of Russia's current predicament.
Since Putin took the reigns of power in 2000 he has become almost everybody's best friend -- Belarus' lunatic strongman Aleksander Lukashenko, US President George W. Bush, German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder, Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi and Chinese President Jiang Zemin (江澤民). Even North Korea's erratic leader, the hermit Kim Jong-il, who never travels outside his country, has visited Putin twice in recent years.
In fact, North Korea provides a textbook example of Putin's diplomatic method. Putin cultivated Kim when other leaders neglected him. In the summer of last year, the North Korean leader visited Russia to learn about "non-intrusive" -- that is, not entirely Western -- capitalism.
Kim seemed to reason that, while Russia was no longer Soviet, it retained enough socialist overtones to work with his country. The benefit of this "educational experiment" was that Putin became one of the few people to whom Kim Jong-il listens.
But Putin's method is to maintain warm relations with everyone. Even as he hosted Kim in Moscow, Russian diplomats in Pyongyang were helping to protect an American spy in North Korea. Previously spurned by America in its attempts to use its longstanding contacts in Asia, this assistance appears to have convinced America that Russia can be of real help in its diplomacy with North Korea.
Final negotiations over North Korea's nuclear ambitions will undoubtedly need to take place between the US and Kim Jong-il. What Putin may be able to provide is the diplomatic cover the US president needs to maintain his pose of not negotiating directly with the North Koreans. This will allow Bush to avoid seeming to surrender to the threat of nuclear blackmail.
As a diplomatic practitioner, Putin has learned history's lessons and is determined not to see his country ringed by enmity. Instead of Russia's borders draining his country's economy, he envisions Russia as a transit point between east and west, and also as an engine of growth for countries in search of the heavy industrial equipment Russia makes. A rail link between South Korea and Siberia, to carry Korean and Japanese goods west and Russian resource exports east, may be but one positive result of any successful deal he may broker on the Korean Peninsula.
Of course, some of the old suspicions about Russian motives linger in the West, most particularly over Iraq (where Lukoil, Russia's biggest oil company, recently signed a new deal to develop Iraqi oil fields). But Putin's interventions in the UN Security Council over Iraq have been far more moderate than, say, those of France and Germany, two of America's historic allies. This is so, even though Russia has vital national interests to protect in Iraq, including real fears about regional instability spreading into Russia's south, with its millions of Muslim citizens.
For too long, Russia practiced either the diplomacy of the thug or that of the Byzantine. The first made potential partners recoil in fear, the second made them shrink in confusion. But a spy's stock-in-trade is recruiting and nurturing collaborators. Those skills are now being put on display by Russia's spymaster president. No one is complaining.
Nina Khrushcheva teaches international affairs at the New School University and Columbia University.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath