The prospect of a KMT-PFP coalition in the upcoming presidential election has become a subject of heated debate. The KMT's open apology to clear up the Chung Hsing Bills Finance scandal has created a better mood for cooperation between the two parties.
But, whether it is possible for KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
In fact, Soong, according to the number of votes he received in the 2000 presidential election, should stand a better chance of qualifying as a presidential candidate than Lien. On the whole, the political strength of the PFP, unfortunately, still cannot match that of the KMT. The pan-blue camp, therefore, is still unable to take Soong as the best presidential candidate. No wonder former Control Yuan president Wang Tso-yung (王作榮), who has continuously advocated a Lien-Soong ticket, believes that Soong will play a supporting role at best.
The KMT has showed determination to reorganize and rebuild the party after losing power. Although the party's image is not as good as the PFP's, the KMT has some advantages, such as its number of seats in the Legislative Yuan, political resources and party assets. Therefore, the KMT has been able to secure its position in Taiwan's political arena and retain its influence to contend with the DPP.
The majority of Taiwanese still believe that the KMT stands a better chance of defeating the DPP and regaining power than the PFP. This is the key to why Lien, after he lost in the past presidential election, has continued to be recognized by everyone as a popular presidential candidate. Lien is perhaps not as talented and intelligent as Soong, but Lien is generally acknowledged by outsiders as a leadership figure. Compared to Soong, who is good at political maneuvering, Lien appears to be better equipped with presidential manners.
Lien lost in the past presidential election mainly because of the "dump Lien to save Soong" strategic voting by the anti-Chen Shui-bian (
Therefore, if the KMT and PFP leaders can get a clear understanding of why they lost in the presidential election, there should not be any problem for the pan-blue camp to unanimously nominate a set of presidential and vice-presidential candidates. The Lien-Soong pair is a political coalition which will emerge in its own time to challenge Chen. There is absolutely no need for the KMT to rely on public opinion polls to designate Lien or Soong as the presidential or vice-presidential candidate.
If a Lien-Soong ticket does not emerge, or the KMT and PFP are unable to successfully build a coalition, everyone knows that there will be no one to contend with Chen in the 2004 presidential election. Therefore, we still believe that a Lien-Soong pair is inevitable. Only a Lien-Soong ticket can defeat Chen and regain power. With regard to the apology for the Chung Hsing Bills Finance scandal, the KMT has already made great strides to team up with Soong.
As a result, Chen's overall strategy for re-election must focus on winning more than half of the votes. Chen should not expect to benefit from the failures of a KMT-PFP coalition or a Lien-Soong ticket. In the game of political maneuvering, the DPP should not care about the political uproar surrounding whether Lien and Soong will team up. Instead, the DPP should take the opportunity to stabilize the foundation of Taiwan's economic development in order to demonstrate that the hateful, political conflict between Lien and Soong is the source of political instability. Even if Lien and Soong build a coalition, there is no guarantee that they will defeat Chen.
Chen Sung-shan is a member of the Civil Service Protection and Training Commission at the Examination Yuan.
Translated by Grace Shaw
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing