The stir over cult leader Sung Chi-li (宋七力), the attacks by entertainer Pai Ping-ping (白冰冰) and the Zanadau scandal all failed to bring down Kaohsiung Mayor Frank Hsieh (謝長廷). Will he escape disaster yet again over the vote-buying scandal surrounding Kaohsiung City Council?
Vote-buying in the election for speaker of the city council should be the problem least likely to sully the mayor's reputation. Although the administrative head of a city government will naturally be concerned about the results of city council elections and will also use the political resources at his disposal to influence those elections, it would be a rare chief executive who in the course of a mayoral campaign would be so bold and reckless as to get involved in buying votes from city councilors.
As the boss, how will Hsieh emerge from this situation in one piece? This is not just a judicial question; it is also a question of political credit.
The DPP threw its full weight into helping Hsieh in his re-election bid. In the process, it became the party with the most seats on the city council for the first time in the council's history. Very quickly, however, all these accomplishments, together with the DPP's entire credibility have been consumed by crisis.
It would certainly not be fair to blame Kaohsiung's corrupt political environment entirely on Hsieh. After Chu An-hsiung (朱安雄) and his wife, Wu Te-mei (吳德美), were taken into custody Hsieh said bitterly that the city council could expel the mayor and other officials from the council's chambers, but since in the end the mayor's budget must be approved by the council, he could not criticize the council. All he could do was to hold back his tears.
Organized crime
The city council Hsieh faces is influenced by organized crime, has members who are suspected of major economic fraud and contains opposition party councilors eager to boycott Hsieh on the slightest pretext. Meanwhile, Hsieh's goal is to avoid being constrained by the city council and to accomplish as much as possible as mayor. A good record as mayor will be a necessary prerequisite for any advance in his political career. In order to establish such a record, he needs people like Civil Affairs Bureau director Wang Wen-cheng (
In officialdom, many clever subordinates depend on their own judgement to establish limits when handling complex matters. A clever boss need not concern himself too much with the details of these arrangements and probably won't ask too many questions.
Trust
This is a form of trust and also a sort of opportunism. The boss believes his subordinate can put everything in order, and subordinates shield the boss from being implicated in scandal.
Prior to the council speaker election, most councilors shared a common attitude. Among a batch of rotten apples, they were looking for a couple of relatively good ones. "Relatively good" generally means relatively beneficial or at least not too harmful to oneself or one's own camp. This is also a sort of opportunism. Not even the most heavily represented party can change such a corrupt environment. One can only try to stay out of harm's way or develop good relations with others for everyone's mutual benefit.
Opportunism has become a fertile ground allowing a corrupt political environment to continue to thrive. People who were originally just trying to stay out of harm's way need only drop their guard for an instant and they will be implicated as accomplices to a crime.
The saga of the Kaohsiung city council is an extreme case, but it is also a reflection of Taiwan's corrupt political culture. For someone in Hsieh's position, the rational choice (with a little opportunism thrown in for good measure) would never be to attempt to change this kind of environment.
By fighting with the city council, he would end up accomplishing nothing after four years. The public wouldn't understand him; his political enemies would criticize him; and his political future would be put in jeopardy.
The Kaohsiung city councilors are still acting opportunistically in their new roles as "tainted witnesses." One can imagine that after they admit their own culpability, their political futures will be in doubt. They will have no choice but to use the next four years as an opportunity to win back what they have lost.
But as a national political leader, Hsieh can't just hope for four good years. Now that he has been forced to fight for his political life and eradicate the possibility of opportunism, perhaps the situation can be turned around and Kaohsiung's political environment reformed.
Ku Er-teh is a freelance writer.
Translated by Ethan Harkness
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing