A few days ago, two of my colleagues told me a sad story. Their children, in their first year of junior high school, have no problems reading English. Some students in their class, however, often hand in unanswered test papers because they have completely given up on learning the language.
It is true that there are students who give up English in their first year of junior high school. The Ministry of Education has taken some measures in response to the growing trend, but these measures are intended to come into play only after the students have given up. Unfortunately, students who have already given up are rarely inclined to resume their study of the language. To give up English is a serious matter, one which the children involved will later come to regret and which will have negative consequences for them.
The government must take swift action to deal with this urgent problem. Those students who give up English probably have no money for supplementary schooling or tutoring. We should therefore provide them with free tutors. As there are universities in the vicinities of many towns and villages, students could assist junior high school students in their language study.
The ministry should take the initiative to establish contact with junior high schools and identify the poor and disadvantaged students who need help in their study of English. The ministry should sign a contract with the universities allowing the latter to select qualified student tutors and the former to conduct quality control by conducting random spot checks.
My experience in student counselling tells me that pronunciation is the biggest challenge for first-year junior high school students. The tutors should repeatedly recite the English vocabulary to the students, starting with simple and basic words. Phonetic aids would ideally not be used. Children should be encouraged to work out the sound of the word and pronounce it on their own. They can make progress if they are able to guess the pronunciation. It doesn't matter if they make mistakes. Remuneration, of course, should be provided to student tutors.
If possible, the ministry should provide an electronic English dictionary equipped with pronunciation functions, to each and every one of the disadvantaged students.
If budget constraints prevent this, however, public welfare organizations should contribute funds to assist the ministry with the problem of junior high school students giving up English. The fact that students tend never to learn English once they have opted to give it up stands to cost the individuals concerned and the country dearly.
The government must assume responsibility for these students who abandon their pursuit of English. It must take decisive action to help these disadvantaged students.
Lee Chia-tung is a professor at National Chinan University.
Translated by Grace Shaw
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath