The Ministry of Education has introduced wide-ranging educational reform measures in recent years. Course content and teaching methods have changed, as have the systems for gaining entry to both senior high school and college.
As a result, the pressure on students has increased, forcing them to attend more cram schools. They even have to haggle over every point at their regular schools. But their aca-demic ability has deteriorated. The much-publicized "Constructive Mathematics" for elementary school students, for example, has been severely criticized recently because teachers and parents have found that stu-dents' ability in mathematics has declined. Meanwhile, the new Diversified Enrollment Scheme is unfair to the poor. First-year junior high school English textbooks are so difficult that students who cannot afford to attend language schools may simply not stand a chance. In such circumstances, fairness in education is eliminated.
As of this year, the Nine-Year Educational Program -- which aims to integrate elementary and high school systems -- is being applied to the first year of junior high school. Although all subjects have been integrated into seven major categories, teachers still follow the old method and teach them separately. Otherwise, they simply wouldn't be able to complete their duties under the new program. Chemistry teachers, for example, can't teach biology courses because they are not biologists. According to a newspaper report, one school requires all art teachers to teach music. As a consequence, one art teacher who didn't know how to teach music had no choice but to take an extended period of leave. A child cannot relive his or her childhood and teenage years if mistakes occur. Today's parents can do nothing when their children are treated like guinea pigs.
What are the ideals of education reform? What are the educational goals? What needs to be changed and how? Not only parents and students but also teachers and scholars are unclear about these questions.
What, moreover, is the theoretical basis for the way reform has been implemented? Was thorough research conducted before the system was introduced? Or was it just introduced as a result of arbitrary decision making? If the reforms were based on a comprehensive design, why has the college application process this year been a big mess? Why have the new Basic Competency Tests for junior high school students become yet another gigantic joint entrance examination? Why have the enrollment schemes broadened the gap between rich and poor? Why have students' abilities in mathematics and Chinese declined, and college students lost their enthusiasm for learning?
The ministry is the department in charge of education reforms. The brilliant suggestions of scholars will come to nothing if the ministry doesn't take them into consideration. The ministry should be held responsible for the success or failure of reforms. Its reform policy, affecting the futures of countless students, is a major aspect of public policy and should be opened to discussion. Once the policy has been made, the government should clearly inform us of its ideals and goals and the reason for adopting such methods. Only when it does can the public work together toward the ideals and goals of education reforms and examine the appropriateness and effectiveness of reform plans.
As education reforms are often questioned, it is to be hoped that the government will adopt a more cautious and open approach to introducing reforms that have a major bearing on the nation's future.
Shen Mei-chen is a lawyer.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing