An explosive proposal to have conscripts pay a "national defense tax" instead of doing their mandatory military service has been greeted with polarized and divergent responses in Taiwan. While an implementation of the proposal will probably help raise funds the Ministry of National Defense badly needs for the incremental shift toward a professional military force, the moral hurdle that it must first overcome is simply too paramount. After all, the proposal cannot escape skepticism about blatant discrimination against the poor.
Amidst all the problems confronting the nation's national defense, the quality of the armed forces has come under increasing scrutiny and attack. As indicated by a White Paper recently released by the ministry, and the list of arms being sold to Taiwan by the US, among many other objective factors, an army that is highly mobile, easy to maneuver and well-trained for high-tech and information warfare is what Taiwan needs. Since Taiwan can never match up to China in size, it might as well seek to surpass the Chinese army in those fields.
As a professional volunteer force would seem much better suited to produce an army of this quality, proposals have been made to make gradual shifts from the current system, under which servicemen are mostly conscripts doing their two-year mandatory service, to the new proposed system. In fact, the ministry's latest White Paper indicates that, in future, the percentage of conscripts in the military will be reduced to 40 percent. The figure is expected to further decrease in the years to come.
But, the question is "where is the money?" The truth of the matter is, the government is having problems coming up with the money to purchase the badly needed arms from the US as it is. Quality professional recruits do not come cheap, in particular in a culture where a career in the armed forces is not well-respected. This is not to mention the valuable but costly training that the nation's servicemen need to be put through, irrespective of whether they are conscripts or volunteers, in order to fully modernize the army.
Currently, two types of "national defense tax" are being studied. Under a system of "offset national defense tax (
DPP lawmaker Li Wen-chung (
Some have pointed out that other countries have collected a "national defense tax," including China. But, the problem is, in China, people are not allowed to offset military service with payment of these taxes. Instead, such taxes are collected to subsidize retirement pensions for veterans or salaries for servicemen. This kind of arrangement does not pose the problems of the systems being proposed here -- only those who can pay get to escape military service.
Serving in the military is a constitutionally imposed duty on the men of this country. That duty can only be either uniformly performed or uniformly removed. Financial prowess should not play a role at all.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath