On May 1, local media uncovered the Armed Forces Police Command's (AFPC,
According to Article 20 of the ROC Constitution, "The people shall have the duty of performing military service in accordance with the law." In Taiwan -- which has a conscription system -- all male citizens are liable for military service once they reach the age of 18, according to the Military Service Law (兵役法). In 1994, the defense ministry officially stopped treating homosexuality as an illness. That being so, gay men, just like any other men on the island, have the obligation to perform military service in accordance with the law. Also, they should have the chance of being selected for the military police, who are considered the elite in the armed forces.
Unfortunately, due to the above restriction, homosexual conscripts -- along with gangsters, criminal offenders, drug addicts and Chinese immigrants -- are barred from becoming military police due to "security concerns." According to the AFPC, the military police are responsible for the important tasks of guarding military and government installations, enforcing military law, maintaining military discipline, supporting combat troops and serving as supplementary police. For the sake of military discipline and order, therefore, it is inappropriate for "potentially dangerous elements" -- such as those with Gender Identity Disorder (GID, 性別認同障礙) -- to serve as military police.
The above logic is ridiculous, as no evidence has shown that homosexuality is a threat to the military -- not to mention that homosexuality and GID are different matters. In contrast, sexual harassment of female officers, military abuses and scandals involving heterosexuals frequently occur in Taiwan. Some of our heterosexual officers have committed major crimes, including rape and murder. Why didn't the military also exclude all heterosexuals from serving as military police for "security concerns?"
More seriously, the ban on homosexuals is clearly a violation of basic human rights, especially working rights. According to Article 15 of the Constitution, "The people shall have the right to existence, the right to work and the right to property." To protect and promote human rights, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) has vowed to eliminate discrimination. To achieve this goal, the government came up with the nation's first "human rights white paper" on Jan. 31 -- in an effort to show Taiwan's determination to uphold human rights. The military's ban, however, is just like a slap on Chen's face, as homosexuals are not even allowed to guard the Presidential Office or the president's home. Such a discriminatory measure will undoubtedly damage Taiwan's reputation in the world.
The military police have always been careful in their selection of recruits because of the nature of their work. When selecting new blood, nevertheless, they should focus on a man's capability, not his sexual orientation. Meanwhile, the defense ministry should provide educational programs to safeguard human rights, so that it can stop discrimination in the military against people on the basis of their sexual orientation.
Chang Sheng-en is a lecturer of English at National Taipei College of Business.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath