Cross-strait relations were not a focal point of the meetings of the National People's Congress (NPC) or the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference. During a speech given on March 12, however, Chinese President Jiang Zemin (江澤民), in his capacity as chairman of the Central Military Commission, boasted to a group of representatives from the People's Liberation Army that all troops must be prepared to resolve the Taiwan question through military means. Jiang said the army should be able to instantly respond to one order and emerge victorious.
On March 15, in a press conference following the NPC's closing ceremony, Premier Zhu Rongji (朱鎔基) stated that the Chinese Communist Party's Taiwan policy had not changed and that Beijing had not abandoned the use of military might as a means to resolve the Taiwan question. However, Zhu also said that it was not necessary to repeat this policy statement day after day, month after month.
From this perspective, the Chinese Communist Party has not changed its autocratic, hegemonist nature and militaristic style, even though it has affected a smile for Taiwan recently. The military budget announced at the NPC meeting constituted a 17.6 percent increase over last year. This is the 13th year the military budget has grown by more than 10 percent. Still, experts estimate the actual increase is as much as three to five times the figure announced at the congress.
In 2000, China was the world's largest importer of arms. Over the past few years, Beijing has bought large quantities of advanced weaponry from Russia, such as Sukhoi fighter jets, Sovremenny-class destroyers and Kilo-class submarines, and has engaged in the research and development of 093-class nuclear-powered attack submarines. There have been rumors recently that China has obtained 40 advanced Shkval (Squall) torpedoes from Russia. These are the "capital" Beijing will use to threaten Taiwan with.
With China's military expansion, one also sees the threat posed by China to Taiwan's security. But Taiwan should not panic in the face of this threat. The books that appeared a few years ago exagerrated China's military strength. Certain politicians with ulterior motives have also exagerrated China's military might in order to scare the people of Taiwan into accepting Beijing's conditions for unification.
A recent article in the Washington Post, however, which points out a crisis of confidence -- as well as other more substantive crises within China's military -- can help us to keep our cool and more objectively face China's military threat.
Similar reports have previously appeared on China's domestic Web sites, pointing out the military's "top 10 secret worries." Concerns related to a confidence crisis were corruption, bureaucratic behavior, lax discipline and low morale. More tangible concerns included the fact that newly purchased weapons lacked proper maintenance by trained personnel and are thus unlikely to be very useful. For example, about 60 percent of the Sukhoi 27 fighters purchased from Russia were unable to even take off. Incomplete equipment may render some of the new hardware incapable of being more than military targets. Sovremenny-class destroyers without early warning planes are a case in point.
During a modernization drive more than 100 years ago, Ching dynasty government officials studied the enemy's tactics in order to vanquish the foreigners. Hoping to build a strong navy with awesome firepower, the government purchased foreign ships and canons and established its own Northern Navy. Because of corruption, however, China's miltiary was defeated by the Japanese in 1894.
Today the Chinese army's predicament is much the same. The communist party didn't want to disclose the recent discovery of bugging devices found aboard Jiang's presidential jet. Its comment that the devices were planted by a "fool" further hints at the presence of internal treachery. Because the person responsible for the plane's purchase and maintenance was Liu Taichi -- deputy director of the air force's armament department and son of the late party commander Liu Bocheng (劉伯承) -- an investigation was launched into the poss-ible existence of an "air force corruption gang" headed by Liu.
Apart from these, the People's Liberation Army Daily has revealed that there are numerous "connected soldiers" who have all sorts of connections -- relatives, local ties, military links and business connections. Some soldiers' parents, in order to make their childrens' future in the military more straightforward, send 10,000 yuan to their children annually.
One phenomenon that wasn't mentioned in the People's Liberation Army Daily piece was that some people actually enter the military via their connections. Decommissioned soldiers tend to get better civilian jobs compared to other civilians. In addition, because of experience gained while in the military, these ex-soldiers also tend to be promoted more easily in their civilian workplaces. This fact, combined with a high unemployment rate, have made the post-Cultural Revolution military once again a popular place to work.
The party's media reported that the "one child policy" has been more successfully implemented in the cities than in the countryside. Ninety percent of young soldiers coming from cities are only children. Of those soldiers coming from small to medium-sized cities -- or from developed countryside areas -- 70 percent were only children. Their pampered-from-birth nature worries the party. The media report didn't address the question of whether these young soldiers, who grew up without the influence of traditional Confucian values, are either willing or able to fight heroically for their country.
Party leaders surely understand their military's limited ability to wage war on Taiwan. They therefore must resort to repeating their threats day after day, month after month. Once everyone becomes numbed by their incessant talk, they'll need to choose to either talk less, or not at all. This won't signify a change of policy or that China is no longer Taiwan's enemy. Once errors appear in judgement or decision-making, Taiwan will suffer serious harm. Therefore, neither Taiwan nor the US can lower its guard.
In the face of the party's military threat, increased US military cooperation with Taiwan -- based on the Taiwan Relations Act and Washington's "six assur-ances" -- is also inevitable. The entire world is under threat, not just Taiwan. This accounts for Minister of National Defense Tang Yao-ming's (湯曜明) visit to the US earlier this month and his meetings with high-level US officials.
Preventing China from using military force is still better than using military might to force China to stop once it has started.
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in New York.
Translated by Scudder Smith
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing