The accusations leveled against former National Security Bureau (NSB) cashier Liu Kuan-chun (
Liu's alleged escapades have put a spotlight once again on the question of the loyalty of Taiwan's intelligence, military and government personnel. Many of these people were brainwashed by the KMT to believe that loyalty to the party equalled patriotism. The KMT is out of power, the territory of the country is changing and some people have not been adapting well to the changes. Confused about national identity, they run the risk of harming national interests, whether by pushing for unification, pulling their capital out of Taiwan, or spilling secrets. Don't forget that Liu tried to blackmail the government by threatening to defect to China and provide Beijing with secret documents unless Taiwan gave him a pardon in the embezzlement case.
A careful read of the documents published by Next and the China Times shows that their content has more to do with state secrets than any corruption scandal. PFP Legislator Chou Hsi-wei (
The reports do provide detailed information about the government's non-official diplomatic channels in the US, Japan and South Africa. Names, positions and the amounts of money involved in such projects have been revealed. The laying bare of such details could embarrass Taiwan's friends in the international community and damage the country's reputation. It could also create a sense of insecurity among those working for Taiwan's interests in the international community -- a fear that their identities could be exposed some day.
An action that seriously compromises national security and interests cannot be viewed from the perspective of press freedom alone. The prosecutors did act legally in carrying out the raids, in that they had obtained the Taiwan High Court's authorization. So perhaps the real question is just how secret these "national secrets" really were. The existence and scope of the NSB's secret funds was publicized two years ago when Liu fled Taiwan. The fact that Taiwan has spent a lot of money to maintain its diplomatic presence has been the subject of debate in the legislature for years, along with questions about the scale of the funding.
National security is one thing, secrecy is another. It's time for a thorough house-cleaning of the NSB to get rid of the incompetents and those who have been obstructing efforts to make the agency more accountable. More oversight of military, intelligence and diplomatic budgets would limit the chance of improprieties occurring under the guise of national security.
Taiwan lived for far too long under the shadow and paranoia of the KMT regime to accept accusations of security violations or wrongdoing without clear evidence to back up such claims.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath