On Sept. 21, 1999, a devastating earthquake in Taiwan caused a blackout nationwide, forcing silicon-wafer foundries in the Hsinchu Science-based Industrial Park (新竹科學工業園區) to halt production. The global supply chain was taken by surprise and high-tech shares in New York nosedived as a result. The earthquake unexpectedly made Taiwanese aware of Taiwan's importance in the world economy.
Statistics show that one-fifth of global information technology (IT) products are wholly or partially manufactured in Taiwan, according to Craig Addison in Silicon Shield: Taiwan's Protection Against Chinese Attack. One-third of all chips are also produced in Taiwan. Since these are "strategic components," security across the Taiwan Strait will be important and the US will find it difficult to give up Taiwan as long as the US computer industry is dependent on Taiwan's original equipment manufacturing (OEM). This is a guarantee for Taiwan and the origin of the "silicon shield" theory.
Deplorably, Taiwan's secret weapon, the silicon shield, is now being handed over to China by Taiwanese businesses. Chinese leaders have sensed the power of Taiwan's production capacity, the importance of which has surpassed Middle Eastern oil in recent years. Silicon products have become fundamental materials indispensable for advanced countries. How to disarm Taiwan's industry has become part of Beijing's grand strategy, as well as the main reason behind China's all-out efforts to lure Taiwan's high-tech industry during the past few years.
China's efforts to attract Taiwanese investment have indeed yielded results. Taiwan's China-bound investments, totalling billions of US dollars a year, have made China the world's third biggest producer of IT products, after the US and Japan. Taiwan has fallen far behind China in terms of output value. Although 70 percent of China's IT products are manufactured by Taiwanese companies, it is an indisputable fact that the equipment and technology has been moved across the Strait because those companies are China-based.
China's ultimate goal is the silicon wafer fabs. For the past two-and-a-half years, Beijing has mobilized the kinsmen of China's high-ranking officials to win over Taiwanese businesspeople and enlist Taiwan's wafer management and technical talent. Beijing also intends to make use of the wafer fever to unnerve Western companies into participation. The laissez-faire attitude of Taiwan's government has also aided China's tactics. Despite prohibition and penalties stipulated in law, many cases have been left unsettled for "lack of concrete evidence."
This issue cannot be simply passed off as an irreversible trend because it is unimaginable that no concrete evidence has been found over the past decade regarding the tens of thousands of cases of illegal investments in China. Now the Taiwanese-led, illegally invested wafer fabs in China have finally started operation. They are also snatching orders from Taiwan in cutthroat price competition. Is there really nothing the government can do about them? If that is the case, it is most unfair to law-abiding companies. It will also make a mockery of law and order in Taiwan.
Semiconductors are key components in IT and electronics products and are viewed as a strategic sector by advanced countries. Therefore, restrictions have been imposed on exports of technology and equipment, such as the US restrictions on the equipment for eight-inch fabs using 0.25 microns or smaller etching technology. But, despite being a US ally and relying on US military support, Taiwan has been reckless about China-bound silicon-wafer investment.
Allowing Taiwanese businesses to invest in eight-inch chip fabs in China will quickly bring about a cluster effect, enabling China's fab industry to upgrade its production and overtake its competitors in Taiwan. Helping it will be Taiwanese businesses' well-established personal connections in Taiwan, their contact with Taiwan's technology, Beijing's ambitions and assistance, and the laissez-faire attitude of Taiwan's government. China will replace Taiwan as the global factory of silicon products such as semiconductors and become a partner the US will have to rely on for the sustainable development of its technological economy. At that time, Taiwan's silicon shield will have passed to China's hands.
As a result, the US may well abandon the Taiwan Relations Act, just as it gave up recognition of Taiwan 30 years ago. US businesspeople will become China's lobbyists in Congress, saying Taiwanese businesses have moved west and economic integration between China and Taiwan is complete. Similarly, the US abandoned its recognition of Taiwan following the signing of the Shanghai Communique.
So should we sit back and await our doom? For the sake of the nation's sustainable development, we must construct a mechanism for "effective management" and realize the consensus reached at the Economic Development Advisory Conference (經發會): "Taiwan first, a global perspective and sound risk management." Keep the silicon shield in our hands to safeguard national security as well as people's employment and welfare.
Huang Tien-lin is a national policy adviser to the president.
Translated by Jackie Lin
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath