A recent survey in the Hsinchu Science-based Industrial Park shows that, in response to the newly-enacted Gender Equality Labor Law (
The logic that leads to such a conclusion still holds ground in Taiwan because businesses want simply to remain traditional industries and have no aspirations to increase the scale of their activities. In the logic of the knowledge-based economic era, however, the cultivation of human resources is key to competitiveness. US companies, for example, try everything they can to attract innovative and capable workers with high salaries and generous welfare packages. No company with great aspirations will resent its manpower costs, much less sift out workers of a particular gender. That is why the high-tech industry in the US is way ahead of those of other countries today.
Due to the rapid economic and social development of the past 10 years, there is no longer a gap between women and men in Taiwan in terms of educational level. The employment rate for women has remained at around 45 percent, lower than the figures for Japan, South Korea, Hong Kong and Singapore. This is because women in Taiwan have been shackled by their social roles (many leave their jobs voluntarily or involuntarily after marriage or childbirth), or have experienced gender discrimination and employment inequalities in the workplace.
The new law should radically redress the disadvantages they face, so that Taiwan can continue its development and improve the way it uses its human resources. This will not only help improve Taiwan's reputation on human rights, but will also allow the country to connect seamlessly with the operational logic of international corporations.
Most of the multinationals and foreign businesses that have invested and built factories in Taiwan offer incentives to their employees that are based on the standards of their own countries. Many talented men and women are therefore attracted to these businesses. Homegrown companies, on the other hand, face a shortage of high-level human resources and often have to employ people from other countries. They don't necessarily spend any less than the foreign companies because their management and communication costs are increased.
Raising employees' benefits and working conditions to the level of those of their foreign counterparts could help local companies get outstanding local talent to work for them. Within multinational cooperations, it may even prevent disputes and integration difficulties caused by large gaps in labor conditions. The new law provides an important basis for upgrading Taiwan's industries.
Traditional employment models are now increasingly a thing of the past. Meanwhile, the service sector and the newly emerging knowledge-based industries are thriving. The traditional models do not serve adequately to cultivate human resources for these industries. One example is Nokia, of Finland, a country that cherishes its female labor force.
Nokia has a higher ratio of female employees than other corporations. The dramatic rise in the proportions of female employees in newly emerging sectors also reflect a rise in corporate profits and business scale. It is a result of putting the female labor force to good use.
Finally, I hope that following the enactment of the new law, both management and employees will work together to raise Tai-wan's overall competitiveness.
Hsu Chia-ching is secretary-general of the Taiwan Women's Link.
Translated by Francis Huang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath