In an attempt to construct a new relationship framework with his Chinese counterpart, US Presi-dent George W. Bush concluded his recent trip to Beijing by emphasizing the need for Chinese society to move toward economic liberalization and political openness. Bush's trip was truly a "working visit," since he only spent 30 hours in China.
Seeking mainly to pitch his anti-terrorism plans to Chinese leaders, Bush talked in depth about Western democratic values in the speech he delivered at Beijing's prestigious Tsinghua University. During his summit meeting with President Jiang Zemin (
Most people tend to overlook the significance of Bush's speech at Tsinghua University. However, the speech reflects Washington's efforts to incorporate China into the world community and help it become a responsible country. Washington's efforts at building a "candid, constructive and cooperative" relationship with Beijing, as US Secretary of State Colin Powell described it, should be made part of a broader attempt to bring China into international organizations. The aim is to incrementally transform China into a politically democratic and economically liberal country, while at the same time letting Chinese leaders shoulder the responsibility of heading a great power.
As a growing regional power, China's future not only affects the establishment of a new international order, but also influences a peaceful and secure post-Cold War era in the Asia-Pacific region. Furthermore, the liberalization and internationalization of the Chinese economy will no doubt have a decisive affect on the process of globalization.
International observers argue that the danger of war increases when the challenger of the existing international order is an undemocratic state. Democratic countries are generally more satisfied with the status quo. Simply put, democracies do not fight democracies. An undemocratic challenger is more threatening to world order, and hence more likely to induce a more belligerent response from a democratic leader and its allies.
China's growing military might has no doubt created concerns for the region as well as for the US. Given that Beijing is rapidly expanding its political, military and economic influence, it is worth asking whether China understands all the responsibilities of being a "great power." More significantly, does it have the capability to shoulder them? This is not to mention the fact that China has thus far never renounced its threat to use force against Taiwan. Nor did the Chinese leadership indicate a readiness to open talks with President Chen Shui-bian (
Beijing must understand that the status of a great power is illustrated neither by active expansion of military capabilities nor by military threats against smaller countries. Instead, China must understand its responsibilities from the perspective of a leader in the region.
Suppressing Taiwan and creating tension in the Taiwan Strait are not constructive endeavors. The art of being a great power requires the capability and intention of playing a constructive and stabilizing role in the regional order. The world has been closely watching the development of China following the exit of Russian influence from the world stage.
Although Bush took a harsher approach toward China compared with his predecessor, Bill Clinton, the US will continue to engage China for the simple reason that inviting it into the international order is the most effective way of safeguarding regional peace and stability. The difference between Bush and Clinton lies primarily in the process of engagement with Beijing. Obviously, what Bush wants is to let the Chinese people understand the responsibilities of being a great nation.
The new international system creates opportunities and challenges for the normalization of cross-strait relations and maintenance of peace in the Asia-Pacific region. Both sides of the Taiwan Strait must accept the fact that the people of Taiwan have the ultimate right to determine their future. Even Clinton supports the notion that the resolution of the cross-strait issue "requires the assent of the people of Taiwan."
Beijing's leaders must understand that democratization serves China's best interest, paving the way for long-lasting peace and stability. Members of the international community must understand that reciprocity in "rights" and "responsibilities" among states is key to world peace and stability. This understanding can lead us to a post-Cold War world of reconciliation and progress.
Washington and Beijing will enter into a new phase of their relationship only with greater wisdom, creativity and patience, with full appreciation of the meaning of "rights" and "responsibilities." This is the only way all sides can overcome the serious challenges of the new century.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath