As president, one of Chen Shui-bian's (
Two grand-justice candidates will soon be chosen. Political junkies and news media are speculating on the prospects for various hopefuls closely associated with the DPP and who have doctoral degrees in law. There are only a handful of such people.
While each is impressive academically, some are of questionable character and integrity. At least one has been accused of inappropriate conduct with a female subordinate during the early stages of his public service career. The alleged misconduct involved taking her to rest in a hotel during a short walk after work. You don't need to be a rocket scientist to understand the social implications of a married man inviting a single, female subordinate to spend time with him in a hotel room. The key point is to examine his maturity and his judgement. He would seem to lack the moral qualifications for such a position of responsibility.
Public figures in Taiwan have much less privacy than private citizens. Like it or not, their private lives are subject to public scrutiny at all times. Under the media's microscope sooner or later any minor mistake can become a huge scandal. When it comes to judges, the standard of scrutiny is particularly high and a grand justice is supposed to be a role model for the entire judi-ciary. He cannot afford to face the slightest challenge to his integrity in the form of rumors or speculation, let alone a credible account by an innocent victim.
Under amendments made to the Constitution in 2000, all 15 grand-justice posts will be up for nomination by the president next year. It may be that the Presidential Office is floating a trial balloon by spreading the word that two justices are to be nominated this year.
Thanks to the nation's long history of legal education, however, there is a substantial pool of qualified legal professionals and law professors suitable for the job. A lengthy process of screening their credentials and backgrounds will be needed, but fortunately time is on Chen's side. He need not rush to a decision immediately. Rather, he should appoint a panel of experts and opinion leaders to conduct a thorough and impartial examination of each and every qualified candidate on professional and moral terms. Strict scrutiny of short-listed candidates' private lives will pay off in the long run.
More significantly, the time should allow Chen to exert wise influence over Taiwan's constitutional development.
Consider the US Supreme Court. The first female judge, Sandra Day O'Connor, a Republican, was nominated by President Ronald Reagan in 1981. After 20 years' service on the bench, she is now widely perceived as the tie-breaking member of the nine-member panel. As an American icon, O'Connor not only inspires female law students but also plays a deciding role from time to time in shaping majority opinion in many landmark cases.
Similarly, Chen should follow suit by offering the grand justice posts to competent candidates with clean private lives. History will testify to the ability of the grand justices as well as the quality of the legacy they leave to the people, in whose name the power of nomination is exercised.
Youthful indiscretions are socially forgivable but professionally unacceptable when it comes to selecting grand jus-tices. There are so many jobs other than those on the bench to award to political comrades. The bottom line is that Chen should not embarrass himself by nominating an inappropriate candidate to sit on the highest court.
Ernie Ko is the editor-in-chief of the Yuda Times.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath