These days virtually everything happening has some connection with winning votes for the Dec. 1 election. For this reason, local governments are hard at work ensuring that there are public displays about "your tax dollar at work" -- one reason that so many long-overdue sidewalk and road repairs are being carried out now. This is also why the Taipei City Council has just passed some very stringent regulations covering the Internet cafe industry.
That laws are enacted with ulterior motives should come as no surprise. But at least the laws should deal effectively with the problems they were designed to address. This is hardly the case with the new Taipei City ordinance.
As Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
According to the new regulations, Internet cafes in Taipei will have to be located at least 200m away from primary, junior high and senior high schools -- as if that distance would prove to be an obstacle. And since children under age 15 can only enter Internet cafes if accompanied by a parent, what is the point of banning cafes within 200m of primary and junior high schools?
Then there is the requirement that all Internet cafes must be located on streets that are at least 8m wide. Quite how this will discourage patronage, we cannot imagine.
Many Internet cafes will, however, have to shut down, since it is very difficult to find locations that aren't within a stone's throw of some kind of school, especially in downtown Taipei, and main street locations are very expensive. Perhaps that is what the City Council had in mind all along. Rather than giving youngsters the incentive to exercise self-discipline or trying to ensure that parents provide some guidance, council members simply want to make it impossible for the cafes to survive.
Some of the new rules are more reasonable -- especially the ones regulating the materials that youngsters can come into contact with at the cafes. But these provisions require diligent enforcement and monitoring. In view of Ma's predilection for short-lived but well-publicized enforcement campaigns, we cannot imagine that a long-running monitoring effort can be successfully mounted.
Internet cafes can provide a healthy and creative outlet for youngsters, something that is sorely lacking not only in Taipei but in the rest of Taiwan as well. They can serve as an escape valve or a haven for youngsters facing problems at home or at school. Shutting down these cafes does not mean that all the youngsters spending time at such places will just go home.
Closing Internet cafes will also not stop the predilection of adolescents for "hanging out." The question is, therefore, how deleterious to them hanging out in Internet cafes might be compared with the other options at hand -- KTVs or pool halls or drag-racing on city streets.
The lack of common sense and detachment from the real world shown in the drafting of these new bylaws is proof that virtual reality exists not only on computer screens, but in the legal code of Taipei City. Perhaps voters should be wondering more about the legal fantasies dreamed up by their elected representatives than worried about what alternative universes their children might be exploring via the Internet.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath