Three scholars from Beijing visited the Taipei Times office on Wednesday afternoon. They are in Taiwan at the invitation of a local academic organization to observe the December elections. The scholars did not say much about what they saw here or what they thought about it. Instead, they showed great interest in the founding and development of this newspaper. However, when it came to the question of why China still can't produce a newspaper of international standards, one scholar commented cooly, "That's a question of concept!"
His answer hit the mark. China has been unable to establish any news media of reasonable quality because communist dogma is the only thing its media workers have in their heads. It's because of the "concept" question that the Beijing regime does not dare allow its people to have freedom of speech. It is the same reason that Beijing's leaders dare not move toward a democratic form of government, but instead cling on to the idea that "Only socialism can save China."
There will be no hope whatsoever for China as long as its leaders stick to communist dogma, rule by ideology and fear to face their own people with new ideas. No matter how vigorously its economy grows, China has major problems to face. The solution to most of China's economic problems lies in coordination from the political establishment. What's needed even more are workable concepts -- universally acceptable concepts, not self-deluding, impossible slogans such as "socialism with a Chinese face" or "socialist market economy." There is no knowing when the Chinese leadership will finally come to understand this.
In a recent interview with the German weekly Die Zeit, President Chen Shui-bian (
The only thing remotely resembling democracy that exists in China now is limited to the village level, where show-case elections are staged for the benefit of foreign observers. How much real democracy these elections could bring, whether they will eventually trigger policy conflicts between elected officials and the Communist Party -- and whether the policies of elected officials will be shelved or buried forever -- are questions that can only be answered by long-term observation. Remarks from Western politicians such as former US president Jimmy Carter -- who said he believes China's so-called "grassroots democracy" is real democracy -- are ludicrous in this regard.
Beijing's tame media have been very good at magnifying the chaos in Taiwan's legislature and using it to convince its domestic audience that Western-style democracy is not suitable for China. In fact, the appearance someday of such a combative legislature in Beijing's Great Hall of the People may be the only way of proving that a true democracy has taken root in China.
If Taiwan can actualize a Western-style democracy, there is no reason why China can't. That's why Taiwan is widely seen around the world as the beacon for China's democratization -- and its media a model for their mainland counterparts as well.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath