Prejudiced by Chinese nationalism, the pro-unification factions on both sides of the Taiwan Strait are singing from the same hymn sheet in describing Taiwan's "nativization" (
In his memoirs, Singapore's former prime minister, Lee Kuan Yew (李光耀), writes that he once told Chinese President Jiang Zemin (江澤民) that had China successfully conquered Taiwan during the 1958 artillery battles in Kinmen and Matsu, it would today be unable to absorb all the US economic and technological resources that are channelled to it through Taiwan. Jiang nodded in agreement.
Even Beijing has to admit that a "region" developed independently of China is now making great contributions to China. Lee went on to ask, "Isn't it better to have Taiwan remain a separate entity? That way, Taiwan will continue to come into contact with western technology and knowledge in the next 40 or 50 years. China will further benefit from Taiwanese investments." Jiang shook his head in disagreement. This anecdote reveals a judgment clouded by Chinese nationalism.
Both history and emerging globalization indicate that the obsession with Chinese unification often results in political, economic and cultural stagnation. Places outside of Chinese control -- such as Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan and even Shanghai, also a foreign colony -- were able to develop independently on the basis of their particular regional characteristics. Now, they are better able to contribute to China and even the ethnic Chinese community.
Singapore, an ethnic Chinese nation outside the control of China, has made an all-out effort to help develop the Suzhou Industrial Park (
Taiwan has made major contributions to China, including US$45 billion in investments and 5.2 million job opportunities. In Jiangsu Province (
Had Singapore, Hong Kong or Taiwan always been under Chinese rule, they might have been unable to make the contributions they have made. They must retain their own political and economic characteristics and continue to act as indispensable points of liaison between China and the world.
Globalization gives local cultures access to the international stage, and the opportunity to be visible worldwide.
This also gives Chinese culture the chance to break free from the post-colonial hegemony of the West.
In addition, developing Internet technologies are creating new platforms for ethnic Chinese culture.
Due to the international importance of local cultures, the development of Chinese culture must rely on these independent variants to enrich its form and content. Otherwise, a unified Chinese monoculture will result in cultural ossification and stagnation.
In other words, because Hong Kong, Singapore and Taiwan have their own local cultural traditions -- even northern China and Guangdong have local cultural peculiarities -- and have developed their unique cultural characteristics, they have an opportunity to interact with, learn from and even admire each other. They can thus contribute to the creation and development of an ethnic Chinese culture.
Lin Cho-shui is a legislator with the DPP.
Translated by Jackie Lin.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath