After agreeing to forward text for key decisions to the seventh session of the Conference of the Parties (COP-7) to the UN Frame-work Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), to be held in October, COP-6 Part II came to a close in Bonn on July 27. Although the negotiators reached a broad political agreement on the operational rulebook for the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, key decisions such as those on the protocol's "flexibility mechanisms," land-use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF) and compliance systems were not finalized by the end of the meeting.
Threatened with an embarrassing collapse of the entire treaty, the European ministers made concessions to Japan on the rules concerning LULUCF and the compliance regime. Japan received extra credits toward its emission goals for protecting its forests. Other countries will also benefit from this compromise.
The agreement reached in Bonn makes it possible for the protocol to enter into force by the time the World Summit on Sustainable Development convenes in Johannesburg next year. It remains to be seen, however, how effective this pact will be without the participation of the US. The Kyoto Protocol requires the 38 industrialized nations to cut carbon dioxide emissions by an average of 5.2 percent below 1990 levels during the five year period from 2008 to 2012. But now, under the revised agreement, the average reduction percentage could drop to a mere 1.8 percent.
There is another problem
concerning funding. While the EU, Canada, Iceland, Norway, New Zealand and Switzerland pledged to provide an annual contribution of US$410 million by 2005 to help developing countries adapt to climate change and develop the technological capacity to avoid adding to the problem, more money is needed.
Originally, the US was committed to contributing one third of the climate change funding under the Kyoto Protocol. But now, the US has made it clear it will not contribute.
The delegates seemed happy about the outcome of the meeting. Not only did they save the protocol; they also kept the global climate change negotiation process alive. The US was totally isolated in Bonn. But, there is no sign of a change in US policy on the Kyoto Protocol. It is likely that the US will submit its alternative proposal at COP-7. In the meantime, efforts are expected by key members to persuade the US to recommit itself to the protocol.
Environmental officials in Taiwan support the country's early participation in the Kyoto Protocol. Unfortunately, the issue of Taiwan's participation in the fight against global warming was not addressed at all in Bonn, though the nation is one of the major carbon dioxide emitters.
Japan's environment minister Yoriko Kawaguchi said in Bonn that "in order to achieve the objectives of the Kyoto Protocol, we need to have the widest possible participation of countries." While his statement was a clear reference to the US, the international community should also seriously consider the role Taiwan can play and the contribution it can make in the fight against global warming.
How can Taiwan get involved in the global climate change negotiation process? Consider the following "flexible" approach.
Taiwan should be invited to participate in the international climate change negotiations and suitable dialogue and implementation mechanisms to be established in the future by applying the concept of "emission entity." Taiwan currently participates in a number of international governmental organizations with the status of "economic entity," "customs territory" and "fishing entity," and under the name "Chinese Taipei." This flexible approach bypasses the problem of Taiwan's sovereignty. It is according to precisely this formula that Taiwan currently participates in APEC and, very soon, will join the WTO.
On Sept. 5, 2000, Taiwan signed the Arrangement for the Participation of Fishing Entities, making it possible for it to participate in the work of the commission to be created by the Convention on the Conservation and Management of Highly Migratory Fish Stocks in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean (the Pacific tuna convention). While China originally opposed allowing Taiwan's membership in the commission, it now accepts this arrangement, as it does Taiwan's participation in APEC and the WTO.
It should be noted that the concept of a "fishing entity" was incorporated into the Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) of Dec. 10, 1982 relating to the fishing stocks agreement that was adopted in August 1995. As of June 20, 2001, 29 countries had ratified or acceded to this agreement. When one more country ratifies the fish stocks agreement, it will enter into force. The agreement is considered one of the most important precedents for making special arrangements to involve Taiwan in international efforts to protect the environ-ment. The rationale for incorporating the concept of a "fishing entity" is the same as that for incorporating an "emission entity." The importance of Tai-wan's role in protecting marine resources has been well recognized. It is to be hoped that Taiwan's role in helping to mitigate global warming can also be recognized.
The international community should welcome Taiwan's contributions to and participation in the international efforts to fight the threat posed by the greenhouse effect. China has no reason to oppose this special arrangement because it avoids the sensitive "one China" issue. The global environment will surely benefit from the realization of this special arrangement for Taiwan.
Song Yann-huei is research fellow at Institute of European and American Studies, Academia Sinica.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath