Today the KMT is to get down to the serious part of its congress, elections for its 210-member Central Committee and 31-seat Central Standing Committee. The elections for the Central Standing Committee (CSC) in particular are important because they provide an indication of the party's ability to reform itself.
The party held an Extraordinary National Congress in June last year in the wake of its election defeat which was a triumph for party solidarity and the status quo and a disaster for any chance the party might have had to reform itself. Five vice chairpersons were elected and a new CSC and, unfortunately, all these senior positions were filled with the same old party hacks we, and almost everyone else in Taiwan, long ago became tired of. What we should have seen was a party which, repudiated at the polls, was finding within that crisis the opportunity to dump some outdated political baggage and begin to redesign policy in accord with what the people of Taiwan actually wanted -- and it says much about the KMT that this would have been such a radical departure. What we in fact saw was the same pompous asses that ran Lien Chan's (
It was indicative of the KMT's brain-dead state that Lien, the man whose ineptness as a candidate lost the election for the party, was confirmed as acting party chairman last June. That Lien was elected chairman by the party membership in March this year was also a triumph of the traditional KMT virtue of loyalty over the common sense that tells us Lien is a loser, people don't like him and won't -- in fact didn't -- vote for him. But that Lien was elected as chairman in an election rigged to exclude other candidates, showed just how incapable of reform the party was.
Something along the same lines is set to be repeated tomorrow where the party chairman submits to the congress the list of CSC members he recommends and they are, inevitably, voted in. It could be, of course, that Lien has had the courage and the intelligence to bring new blood, with maybe some innovative thinking, into the CSC but the auguries are not good.
Time to write the KMT off as a lost cause, then? Perhaps not. Lien is about as out of touch with his electorate as it is possible to be. But obviously there are still some people with a better sense of what will play to the voters of Peikang than he who can still make their opinions felt. The decision not to include Lien's nonsensical "confederation" reunification model as part of the party's official platform shows that someone is still awake. Of course one swallow doesn't make a summer and one reasonably intelligent decision does not make a smart election strategy.
And of course Lien might not -- in fact almost certainly will not -- always listen. Even on the "confederation" he displayed headstrong stubbornness yesterday, which suggests that while he may listen to good advice, sometimes it is only with extreme reluctance that he can dismount a favorite hobby horse. There having been an agreement not to put the confederation idea into the KMT's platform, Lien just couldn't resist telling everyone what a wonderful formula it was. Stubborn, vain, impetuous, obviously lacking in political savvy, the amazing thing about Lien is that he has come so far and that the KMT isn't in revolt against the liability its leader poses.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath