The very day that the government announced that it was no longer a diplomatic ally of Macedonia, legislators from various parties began to sound off on the issue. Most of them seemed to be saying the same things: that Taiwan should have known better and that diplomacy should be about exchanges between nations, not about how much aid money Taiwan can promise or about a head-count of nations who recognize the ROC.
These legislators are right, but the lesson to be learned from the Macedonia drama is one that Taiwan has already been taught time and time again. Unfortunately, the diplomatic corps appears to be a somewhat forgetful body of students. Many political observers had doubts about ties with Macedonia from the very beginning. DPP Legislator Trong Chai (
Insightful comments, but voiced far too late to have
a substantial effect.
But this was not the first time that Taiwan had sought relations with a political partner of questionable staying power. Taiwan established relations with Papua New Guinea in July 1999, but the political situation there was fragile. The decision by then prime minister Bill Skate to recognize the ROC was overturned less than a month later when Mekere Morauta replaced Skate following a parliamentary election. Taiwan's diplomats scrambled to make sense of the situation. Some, privately, conceded defeat to China. Others, such as then minister of foreign affairs Jason Hu (
Later that same year, Taiwan flirted with Albania for diplomatic recognition, even going so far -- according to a Reuters report -- at the time, as to imply that it was prepared to offer US$1 billion in a cash-for-recognition deal. This was done in spite of the fact that most observers and analysts felt that Albania was playing both sides of the China card to its best advantage.
Taiwan's diplomatic corps surely knows what most observers say about buying allies or trying to form relations with countries undergoing volatile political transformation. But there is an unwritten rule of silence among government agencies that does not allow public discussion of the way Taiwan searches for and tries to secure allies.
A case in point was the dumbfounded reaction by members of the Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) administration after the ROC ambassador to Nicaragua flatly told the president and the media that Taiwan should stop giving aid to that country because it was too corrupt. Chen reportedly shook off the criticism by asking: "Who will speak out in support of us if we want to join the UN or the WHO? It's not ourselves but leaders like [Nicaragua's president]."
The ambassador's remarks constitute exactly the kind of candor of which Taiwan needs more of. For having spoken the truth as he saw it, the ambassador may have risked being posted on an extended fact-finding mission to Siberia. But Taiwan needs informed opinion to be voiced before situations get out of hand, not after it's too late.
Chen has said that he wants to revitalize the diplomatic establishment, but as yet little has changed in the way of diplomatic dogma: the more allies the better; hang the cost.
The lessons from Macedonia are not new. The foreign ministry needs to face reality and abandon its blind ambition to add nations to its list of "friends." Sound diplomatic relations should be founded on common political and economic interests, not on a head-count. Lo Chih-cheng (羅致政), chairman of the ministry's research and planning board put it best last August: "It can't be business as usual around here, it has to be better than that."
Mark Wolfe is a freelance writer based in Taipei.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath