During a recent meeting with professors from Japan's Keio University, President Chen Shui-bian
These were not off-the-cuff remarks by any means. Taiwan's strategic importance in the region is declining because of China's political and economic success, the change in US strategies and Taiwan's own weakening economic competitive-ness. To spare Taiwan from strategic marginalization, we need to face up to these three factors. Taiwan's declining economic competitiveness is directly related to the improving political and economic conditions in China. The success of China's economic reforms is a fact and Taiwan must pragmatically face it instead of denying or evading it.
As the US, Japan, South Korea and Southeast Asian countries increase their participation in the China market, Taiwan should not bind its own hands and feet for political reasons. To do so would be detrimental to Taiwan's own political and economic development.
It is questionable how much the Bush administration will improve Taiwan's strategic predicament. Perhaps the administration's Asia-Pacific policy, which places more importance in its allies than in China -- and his correction of Bill Clinton's "strategic partner" definition of China -- signifies a move to rally naval powers against China.
Judging from the actual behavior of Bush's administration, however, I believe any change in US policy toward China and Taiwan will be limited.
US Secretary of State Colin Powell said during a congressional hearing that the US does not view China as an enemy and does not want to see it become an enemy.
The US will also abide by the "one China" policy when it comes to international organizations, reserving formal membership for China while only giving Taiwan "participation but not membership."
The US also continues to hum and haw about military sales to Taiwan and has not given any clear response to Taiwan's request for advanced weapons.
In its future Asia-Pacific diplomacy, Taiwan cannot simply depend on support from powerful countries like Japan and the US. Japan's strategic direction may change at any time. Also, it is currently inclined not to create any conflict with China.
Taiwan should utilize its own resources to build itself a favorable strategic position in East Asia. Given the trend toward peaceful development in the Asia-Pacific region, Taiwan will not have the support of other countries in the event of a conflict with China.
Taiwan should set "peace, development and democracy" as the key notes for its Asia-Pacific strategy. In other words, it should readjust its China policy, recognize the "1992 consensus," resume cross-strait dialogue and stabilize cross-strait relations. Taiwan should strengthen cross-strait trade and economic exchanges and improve its own economic competitiveness and prowess.
Joining hands with other Asia-Pacific countries, Taiwan should encourage a "peaceful evolution" in China and promote China's democratization through exchanges. Only then can Taiwan be integrated into the political and economic network of the Asia-Pacific region and enjoy the increased political and economic benefits of such integration.
Wang Kao-cheng is an associate professor at the Research Institute of International Affairs and Strategic Studies, Tamkang University.
Translated by Francis Huang
When I visited Taiwan last summer, I called on the nation to use its status as a technology superpower to build superweapons. It is obvious to me as I return a year later that Taiwan is now answering that call. By 2030, Taiwan envisions a domestic drone hub, capable of producing large quantities of drones per year. The nation continues to tighten cooperation across the private sector, scientific researchers and the elected government, on creating new and innovative production avenues for defense, while efforts to become central to the “democratic supply chain” are only increasing. Anduril is seeing all of these positive
Singaporean former Prime Minister and current senior minister Lee Hsien- Loong(李顯龍) last month stood on Chinese soil and told Beijing that Singapore cooperates because of “shared interests”, not because of common “ethnic descent,” a significant statement that has upended China’s cognitive warfare tactics of “ethnic nationalism.” Along with using its military buildup and economic growth to expand its international dominance, China has long deployed ethnic politics to promote the idea that all ethnic Chinese around the world, regardless of citizenship, share a tight bond with the Chinese motherland, by which it means the regime of the People’s Republic of China (PRC)
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) in San Francisco on Tuesday last week said if she had not met with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), she would have been “just a plain” and “even negligible” KMT chairperson, bluntly signaling the role she is playing in her visit to the US — Beijing’s messenger from Taiwan. Cheng and her delegation arrived in the US on Monday last week for a two-week visit across five major cities. Her party said the group is scheduled to meet with US lawmakers, officials, policy experts and businesspeople. Before departing, Cheng said her trip
In 1935, the German Reich led by the National Socialist Party officially created the Nuremberg Race Laws, a “legal cage”, for German Jews, stripping them of citizenship, criminalizing their personal relationships, barring them from public life, and transforming them into stateless subjects and isolating them from the rest of society. Similarly, in March 2026, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) National People’s Congress adopted the “Promoting Ethnic Unity and Progress” law, which represents the most significant shift in Chinese domestic governance since the era of Mao Zedong (毛澤東). Ostensibly designed as domestic legislation to manage China’s 56 officially recognized ethnic groups,
RSS