The next legislative and local government head elections are still eight months away, but each political party has started its nomination process. Although the People First Party and the New Party do not have their nomination plans ready yet, both the DPP and the KMT are using party primaries in their nomination systems. The DPP faces severe disputes over its primaries amid rumors of candidates' vote-buying. The KMT is busy negotiating with its candidates, due to the tense competition among them for the primaries.
Ever since the DPP passed its internal regulations for nomination of candidates for public offices (公職候選人提名辦法) in 1989, it has basically followed the principle of negotiation before primaries. Thus, the party's branch offices first try to come up with nominees in accordance with the principle of local autonomy. A local primary is held only when agreement cannot be reached.
The regulations have been modified 11 times since 1989 -- before almost every major election -- in order to adjust the party's primary system. In the past 12 years the DPP has repeatedly modified its primary system -- from one under which candidates were directly decided by party members, representatives, cadres, open primaries for all eligible voters or opinion polls -- in order to end manipulation by party factions, reduce the negative influence of so-called "nominal" party members (人頭黨員) or "pocket" party members (口袋黨員) and stop rampant vote-buying.
Judging from this year's primaries, however, the system has failed to stop corruption in the primaries and the vote-buying practices are worsening -- despite the fact that the proportion of party members' votes required for nomination has been lowered to 30 percent while the proportion of opinion polls has been raised to 70 percent.
The biggest problem in this year's primaries may lie in the design in which both the nominees for "legislators at large"
When facing the poor primaries, besides hoping that the DPP will aggressively attack vote-buying practices, some also suggest that opinion polls be added to the selection of legislator-at- large and overseas legislator nominees. Some even suggest amendments to the Public Officials Elections and Recall Law
Under Taiwan's unique election system and culture, although holding a primary is considered a democratic way for a party to decide its nominees, the design has its congenital defects. In fact, not too many Western political parties hold party primaries, not to mention the unique Taiwan twist of deciding nominees by opinion poll results. Apart from the Taiwanese people's blind faith in opinion polls, this situation also reflects the predicament facing parties under a poor election culture. The question is, can the difficulties really be solved by over-emphasizing the importance of opinion polls? A deeper concern is than if opinion polls continue to play a key role, forging a more responsible and more mature system of party politics in Taiwan will remain remote.
In fact, what needs to be changed most is perhaps Taiwan's current legislative election system of "multi-member district, single vote"
In a word, if Taiwan's legislative election system remains the same, parties' efforts to establish a fair primary system will be, as an Chinese old saying goes, "sorting out silk threads improperly only to tangle them further"
Wang Yeh-lih is chairman of the Department of Political Science at Tunghai University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath