Unfortunately, "A life of commitment remembered" (Feb. 19, page 11) fails to consider, for example, that following the conversion of the "Pe-Po-Hoan" or Ping-pu Aborigines (
The artefacts in the Royal Ontario Museum's collection are thus the ones that escaped the pyres of George MacKay's arrogant missionary zeal. During this period, Mitsubishi ships carried Japanese troops for the 1874-75 attacks against the Paiwan First Nations.
Similarly in the 1870s, the newly independent Canadian government was busy signing fraudulent treaties and constructing under the "Indian Act" a totalitarian system of cultural destruction and social control for Canada's First Nations that was later to serve as an example for the apartheid system in South Africa.
Taiwan's and Canada's Aboriginal peoples continue to suffer severe poverty, cultural losses, high suicide rates, high unemployment rates, etc. When Canadian Aboriginal peoples stand up and resist this colonial legacy, the Canadian government resorts to violent aggression as it did at Oka, Gustafsen Lake, Stoney Point and most recently at Burnt Church.
Mitsubishi is busy destroying forests on lands belonging to the Lubicon Cree in Alberta, Canada. Indonesia smelts ore torn from the lands of Irian Jaya's Aboriginal peoples in partnership with the infamous Freeport-McMoRan.
So this partnership of the Taiwan government, Canadian Government's CTOT and the Shung Ye Group, a major Mitsubishi affiliate, is actually very appropriate given their shared traditions of violence and genocide against Aboriginal peoples.
George MacKay's contributions to Taiwan must be balanced by recognition of his colonial motivations and blatant prejudices. However, no proper understanding of MacKay or Taiwan's Aboriginal history can be had as long as these are distorted and manipulated for PR purposes by the likes of the Taiwan government, Canadian Trade Office in Taipei and the Shung Ye Group's Museum.
Mark Munsterhjelm
Sanchung City
One tough job
About a year ago, many Taiwanese were ecstatic about Chen Shui-bian (
However, his defeated rivals, James Soong (
The omen came true. The KMT, PFP nad New Party proved too much for Chen to bear. Chen did not and could not stand up. He could not stick to his principles and promises -- he fumbled and caved in,although today's chaos might not be any different had he remained determined.
The heads of many Taiwan government branches may have changed, but the KMT remains an overwhelming political force with its control of the Legislative Yuan.
With KMT assets estimated at around NT$80 billion and its influences in agriculture and fishermen's associations, the KMT is still a mighty factor in Taiwan's political arena.
However, these are not excuses for Chen -- he took both the glory and the challenges.
This is neither a time for Chen's supporters to desert him unless they want to see a Soong (
He should hold to his base, appeal to the middle and win the next legislative election for his party. Taiwan's current situation requires a coalition or a majority for a government to function at all. Chen's job is incredibly tough. However, nobody said it was going to be easy.
Yang Ji-charng
Columbus, Ohio
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath