For the first time ever, nearly 90 percent of the research budget of Academia Sinica has been put on hold. This, however, is one Taiwan first that doesn't deserve applause. Rather it is an act of spite by opposition lawmakers at the Legislative Yuan towards Academia Sinica President Lee Yuan-tse (
And of course it is not just Lee who suffers. The entire staff of Academia Sinica is affected by the withholding of the NT$4.4 billion budget for research projects. Nor will the impact necessarily be short term if the budget is released shortly after the new legislative session begins next month. Academia Sinica works together with other prestigious institutes around the world. Its inability to make good on research commitments can only weaken other's future interest to conduct joint research projects with Taiwan.
This act of folly indicates how talented our lawmakers are at lifting a rock only to drop it on our own toes. In other words, it is the people of Taiwan who suffer the consequences, not Lee alone. And for what? So, we have to assume, the opposition lawmakers can humiliate Lee and thereby hound him out of the political arena. Of course, they have good reason to fear Lee. He is seen as a man of impeccable integrity and enjoys the respect of almost every sector of society -- and where is the politician of whom that can be said? His theme of promoting social renaissance in the face of social decay has dealt a heavy blow to the KMT as it struggles to distance itself from "black-gold" influence, with no noticeable results so far. Naturally, Lee would function as a huge stumbling block should he blow the whistle on KMT-nominated legislative candidates in this year's elections.
Ironically, any attempt to force Lee to step down could turn out to be a dire mistake for the KMT and other opposition parties, in that, if he is relieved from official duty as the result of opposition pettiness, he is likely to be far more willing to campaign for the DPP and assist its candidates in the election -- exactly the opposite of what the KMT would like to see. Thus not only is slashing the Academia Sinica budget petty, not only does it endanger Taiwan's future, but it is liable to prove even counter-productive to the selfish political interests of those who did it.
The opposition legislators justified their behavior by saying that Lee had shown a lack of respect to the legislature by not attending a budget review session. The fact is that Lee wasn't taking a vacation but fulfilling his duty as the president of Academia Sinica by going abroad to sign research contracts with other international institutes, the date of which was scheduled before that of the budget review.
Revenge might be sweet but it is often a double-edged sword. This time, the action taken by the opposition camp is very likely to backfire. Pro-education and pro-reform voters in Taiwan will remember the opposition's spite and stupidity in the coming election, as the opposition will find to its cost.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing