Despite the controversy over the vote recount in Florida, the next US president will soon be on the center stage.
But the debate will continue: What if the US president-elect loses the popular vote?
And how can the US presidential electoral system be reformed to better reflect democratic principles?
Many Americans are also casting doubt upon their own democracy, but Chinese dissidents in exile see the Electoral College vote system as a paradigm for China to imitate, if it is to have free elections in the future.
"The US should reform their electoral system to better reflect public opinion, but I think China should adopt such an electoral vote system in the first 100 years of holding free elections. The purpose is to safeguard the rights of minorities in remote provinces where eligible voters are few and which presidential candidates tend to ignore," general secretary of the Alliance for a Democratic China ? Chinese Liberal Democratic Party (
Endorsing Lin's view, Paul Lin (
Therefore, he said that federal (
Lin, nevertheless, expressed his worries that technical problems revealed during the controversy over the credibility of manual vote recounting and outdated voting facilities would further jeopardize the US' democratic foundation.
He, therefore, suggested that the US look into the enhancement of technical facilities and to reform the election system nationwide.
Chris Wu (
Wu said that if Governor George Bush was elected, he would only be a president of the minority (
Wu said that the Republican party's control of both houses would not ensure political stability since their winning margin was only slim, which predicated future stand-offs when it came to voting on issues.
Wu expressed the worry that if Bush was elected, the Senate and the House would then both be in line with Republican party policy.
He believed such a situation would sabotage the design of "checks and balances in power" in terms of party politics.
Once a student leader in the 1989 Tainanmen Square protest (
"No single electoral system can satisfy everybody. Therefore, to follow the rules is among the most important attitudes in democracy. The rule of law should prevail," Wang said.
The impact of the election on the US-China-Taiwan relationship is another factor that depends on the outcome of the Florida election.
Wu said he thought that Bush would play a tougher role when dealing with China internationally since "China depends so much on the US in terms of the WTO entry, technology and financial development, and market demands."
But Wu further said that US policy toward China and Taiwan would not undergo any dramatic change given that Bush had made campaign promises in favor of Taiwan.
Wu said that US interests have always been the American president's top priority.
Both Lins, however, raised doubts on whether Bush would actually get tough with China.
"Bush's father, former [American] President George Bush, had a close relation with China during his presidency ? so close that he even sent American delegates over to China one week after the Tiananmen Square massacre," Lin Qiaoqing said, adding that senior Bush's influence on the junior Bush was undoubted.
Paul Lin also said that Bush's stronger commitment to industries than Gore has made it difficult to predict what he would do after taking control of the White House if he wins the presidency.
"The Republican party is more conservative and anti-communist in nature and tradition.
"Its emphasis on industrial interests will also ironically make it bow to Chinese markets, which may generate inconsistency in Republican policy toward China," he said.
Wu said that the recent political infighting among Chinese top-ranking leaders has kept Chinese President Jiang Zemin's (
According to Wu's analysis, Jiang has been under great political pressures recently and might be defeated in the upcoming political struggle.
"The spectacle he made of himself in front of the Hong Kong media [in late October] was a major minus for his leadership, which shows that the political infighting is extremely fierce and Jiang is probably losing," he said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath