Leaders of the business community recently attended a banquet hosted by the Formosa Plastics Group (
Traditional industries began a feverish rush to invest and establish factories in China around 1992. Despite concerns about this, advocates of the "go-west" theory said "research and development, capital and design will remain in Taiwan," and that "with China in Taiwan's downstream, the resulting division of labor creates a win-win situation for both sides." The government caved in and adopted a policy that neither prohibited nor encouraged the trend.
What happened next? Within a few years, Taiwan's traditional industries were uprooted completely. The industrial parks in central and southern Taiwan have been left in a deserted and ruinous state. The decline of traditional industries created a domino effect on related industries. The depressed real estate market has in turn caused the amount of outstanding bank loans to skyrocket. Why? Because our businesses have invested way too much in China.
Between 1991 and 1996, in terms of investment in China, Taiwan businesses far surpassed major economic powers such as the US and Japan. Translated into GNP, investment by Taiwan was 49 times that of the Japan, and 80 times that of the US. Taiwan's investments are excessive. The door was left wide open. These are the roots of today's banking crisis.
The wounds from this lesson are still fresh. Yet, we are repeating the mistake. In the past two years, the "no haste, be patient" policy has been left out in the cold. The Ministry of Economic Affairs keeps its eyes shut as high-technology industries relocate production bases to China, and build complete vertical production lines. Whenever Taiwan businesses manufacture a product in China, their counterparts in Taiwan face a crisis. As the former enjoys the benefit of cheap labor, the latter begins to lose orders and profits. Sooner or later, the latter has to relocate to China as well. It is either that or shut down. This is a major reason for the decline in the stock prices of high-technology companies.
Wang worries about a financial crisis in Taiwan. His concern is truly touching, while his views about the "no haste, be patient" policy seem sincere as well. Perhaps in the past, implementation of the policy was flawed, meaning necessary restrictions were not put in place, and businesses that should have remained in Taiwan were allowed to relocate to China. On the other hand, too many restrictions were imposed on businesses that had already made significant contributions to Taiwan industries or that should rightfully relocate to China. However, it is also a plain fact that the cause of Taiwan's partial financial crisis is the excessive flow of capital to China. If we further relax restrictions on China investments now, so that the high-technology industries may follow in the footsteps of the traditional industries, the result may be a comprehensive financial crisis. How to deal with the situation is an issue which government and industries must discuss. While the government has much to work on, businesses should also do better.
Huang Tien-lin is a national policy advisor.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath