President Chen Shui-bian's (
The Monica Lewinsky scandal entailed serious legal issues. President Bill Clinton faced at least two legal charges -- perjury and obstruction of justice. He was accused of denying under oath that he had had an extra-martial sexual relationship while testifying in a sexual harassment lawsuit against him. In addition, he was accused of talking Monica Lewinsky, the infamous White House intern with whom he had an affair, into lying under oath about their relationship. The charges, if true, entailed serious violations of the law. Therefore, the US Congress and the Special Prosecutor in charge of the case certainly had legal grounds for investigating Bill Clinton.
On the other hand, Chen's alleged extra-marital affair does not involve such legal implications. Even if the allegations against him are true, there is no legal implication unless the first lady decides to press charges against him and his mistress for adultery. In other words, until any legal action is taken by the first lady, the matter would be entirely private, personal and between the three parties themselves.
Under the circumstances, why did the legislators bring up the subject of Chen's alleged affair during a Legislative Yuan session? What purpose is served by the action? Some have speculated that these legislators had hoped that popular support for the president would decline as a result of the allegations, paving the way for the move to recall the president. If that is the case, we are truly disappointed with them for two reasons. First, the action is certainly below caliber by any standard. Second, they are totally lost about what matters to their constituents. Despite Bill Clinton's obvious misconduct, the American people supported him overwhelmingly, and disapproved of his impeachment, because the US was enjoying an economic boom at the time. What matters most to people in the US, and everywhere as a matter of fact, is putting bread on their table. Everything else becomes secondary in comparison. The economy is also precisely Chen's most vulnerable point. If the economy continues to worsen in Taiwan, Chen may very well be recalled for that reason alone.
Just look at what is transpiring on the floor of the Legislative Yuan these days. On Friday, a male legislator who was involved in an infamous love triangle a few years back openly called out to Chen as "someone who has traveled down the same path" that "it will all be over soon, so keep a light heart." A city councilman asked the Taipei mayor to sign a certificate declaring the mayor's love for his wife. A few other legislators condemned the premier for being involved in an extra-marital affair himself a few years ago.
Our legislature has turned into a circus over the remake of Monica Lewinsky scandal. When will order and dignity be restored in the Legislative Yuan? Perhaps it is time for us to reconsider the possibility of following the US by confining the immunity lawmakers enjoy to speech that is related to legislative activities.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath