In January, China's deputy prime minister Wu Bangguo
At the end of the day, if China is to develop real -- rather than pseudo -- capital markets, privatization is essential,which means a legal structure that protects private property and freedom of contract. As Zhao Zhijun, (
China has made significant progress since 1978 when it initiated its long march toward a market economy. Per capita income has increased more than fourfold, and millions of people have moved from the dying state sector to the vibrant private sector. But serious problems remain, especially in the financial services industry, where foreign competition has been narrowly limited.
The four large state banks continue to monopolize the allocation of scarce capital and restrict the flow of funds to the nonstate sector. Political factors, not profitability, largely determine who gets the funds. Indeed, state-owned enterprises (SOEs) receive more than two-thirds of the funds but account for less than one-third of industrial output value.
The inefficiency of SOEs has caused the state-owned banks to hold nonperforming loans totaling 25 percent or more of outstanding loans.
Recapitalizing the banks is not a panacea. Without institutional change and a hard budget constraint, the politicization of investment decision making will continue. Cheap credit will flow to favored SOEs that will waste scarce capital on low quality "pet"projects with little value to consumers.
Breaking up the large state banks might help increase efficiency if private owners specializing in risk taking and accountability for use of resources take the place of politically motivated state managers whose first loyalty is to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
Making asset values fully dependent on market forces and letting interest rates be freely determined would remove the last vestige of central planning and depoliticize the economy. These measures would end now rampant corruption and lay a sound basis for economic growth.
The party elders must know that privatization is the only logical way to change the incentives and the behavior of inefficient SOEs. But they also recognize that privatization would end the CCP as they know it. Thus, many party members are reluctant to sever ties with the old economy and jump into the sea of private enterprise. Yet, the new economy and global competition may force them to do just that.
It is not difficult to forecast that, with China's entry to the WTO, foreign competition will spur domestic competition and foster growth of the nonstate sector; freedom of choice will expand; alternatives to state provision will give people greater independence; and, as China becomes more open to the outside world and more liberal, the chances for peaceful interaction will increase and those for conflict diminish.
A modern economy requires the free flow of goods, services and ideas. China will have to allow greater freedom of expression and tolerate differences of opinion if it wants to be at the leading edge of the global economy. Pretending to create capital markets by debt-for-equity swaps, in which most of the shares are owned by the state, will not fool international investors.
If China wants to join the new global economy, it must be more open to information flows, allow thoroughgoing privatization, make the renminbi fully convertible and allow greater foreign competition. Those reforms cannot be accomplished overnight, to be sure, but they must begin if China is to take the next step toward freedom and prosperity.
James A. Dorn is a China specialist at the Cato Institute in Washington, DC.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath