Starting this year, there will be no more written language tests for English, Japanese, German, French and Spanish in the government's overseas scholarship programs. The tests will be replaced by language proficiency certificates from language learning institutions designated by the Ministry of Education (MOE,
On the surface, it seems to be a good change. However, a few questions concerning the regulations are worthy of a more in-depth look.
The institutions designated by the MOE include: The Language Training and Testing Center, British Trade and Cultural Office, German Culture Center Taipei, and the Representation Generale de l'Alliance Francaise ? Taipei.
But the questions are:
1. Why did the MOE designate these institutions? Wouldn't it have been good if the MOE had made public its review standards, procedure and personnel and welcomed applications from institutions willing to be part of the program? We never saw the MOE make public these regulations. Even the training of teaching professionals is no longer monopolized by the public teachers' colleges, as private colleges and universities are now also allowed to train teachers. The MOE should not limited the designated language institutions to those six institutions.
2. Why did the MOE favor foreign countries' representative offices in Taiwan? Why are they the only ones qualified to issue proficiency certificates for the five languages?
3. Another regulation of the MOE stipulates those who passed the recent tests for elementary-level English teachers can use a copy of their test results to bypass the requirement for language proficiency certificates. This means that they will be spared from taking proficiency tests again. Can people qualified for, or who have been teaching English at junior and senior high schools, bypass the requirement as well? If not, why not?
4. Why can't the MOE accept, as a substitute for language proficiency certificates, school transcripts from students who have majored or double-majored in languages of the foreign countries in which they intend to pursue their studies on the condition that they received good grades in school (for example, having grades above 80 percent)?
The new regulations seem to be saying that the MOE has little faith in the ability of colleges and universities to train students and conduct language tests. The ministry seems to presume passing the task over to foreign representative offices will solve all the problem!
Lin Shui-Fu is dean of the College of Foreign Languages at Fu Jen Catholic University.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath