Taiwan's political landscape has gone through a subtle change as the new government takes over power. The power structure seems to have remained the same, but the new government has a very different style from the old one -- as exemplified by the very different list of national policy advisors
On the list are many dissidents who suffered persecution during the martial law era. Apart from prominent members of the "tangwai"
Of course, there are also a significant number of business and local faction leaders, as well as academics and professionals. However, the inclusion of former political prisoners and Taiwan independence activists bring an unprecedented mix of colors to the new government.
The list also has a unique kaleidoscopic feature rarely seen in other democracies. There are quite a few senior KMT officials on the list -- at least two former vice presidents, one former premier, a former secretary-general of the presidential office, two members of the KMT Central Standing Committee, plus former government ministers from the KMT.
These positions are basically political arrangements and in practice, the advisors have very little power. In fact, this is a system incompatible with democratic principles, though it is a very convenient one for those in power. It serves to soothe those who lost out in the race for official positions. The posts can also be used as chips in the exchange of political favors. In other words, the system can help stabilize domestic politics. It is no coincidence that both sides of the Taiwan Strait have similar institutions for such advisors.
Style is one of the most salient differences between the new and the old Cabinets. In 1990, many writers and former political prisoners became ministers in Vaclav Havel's new Czech government. Many of them appeared awkward and shy -- not even knowing the appropriate clothes to wear. But those people brought a refreshing vitality to the government.
Similarly, almost no one in Taiwan's new Cabinet knows how to play golf. Many of them do not know how to "wine and dine" or appreciate gourmet food. Some even do not know how to wear ties. In the KMT's official culture, these people would be total misfits. Fortunately, the aristocratic etiquette that developed under the KMT's half-century rule is now going out of fashion.
All the status, arrogance and habits represented by the old government have been replaced by the spirit of the new.
While we do not know how long it will last, we are glad to see a change for once.
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Father’s Day, as celebrated around the world, has its roots in the early 20th century US. In 1910, the state of Washington marked the world’s first official Father’s Day. Later, in 1972, then-US president Richard Nixon signed a proclamation establishing the third Sunday of June as a national holiday honoring fathers. Many countries have since followed suit, adopting the same date. In Taiwan, the celebration takes a different form — both in timing and meaning. Taiwan’s Father’s Day falls on Aug. 8, a date chosen not for historical events, but for the beauty of language. In Mandarin, “eight eight” is pronounced
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
It is difficult to think of an issue that has monopolized political commentary as intensely as the recall movement and the autopsy of the July 26 failures. These commentaries have come from diverse sources within Taiwan and abroad, from local Taiwanese members of the public and academics, foreign academics resident in Taiwan, and overseas Taiwanese working in US universities. There is a lack of consensus that Taiwan’s democracy is either dying in ashes or has become a phoenix rising from the ashes, nurtured into existence by civic groups and rational voters. There are narratives of extreme polarization and an alarming
RSS