Chen Shih-meng (
The monies raised by such a tax would, as the name implies, go toward ensuring national security. However, I think trying to implement such a tax would encounter many obstacles and the whole idea should be scrapped.
First, how would the tax base be defined? Would companies which already have investments in China be liable or just new investors? Or both? What about companies investing in other developing countries? A consensus on just who would be liable would be hard to reach and the debate would be divisive.
Second, what size of a tax is needed to help ensure national security? If the tax rate is too high, business people will try to evade it by establishing companies in third countries to funnel their investments into China. If the rate is too low, the revenue will be too little to be of benefit.
Third, the economic activities of Taiwanese businesses cannot be curbed, whether such a tax is imposed only on business investments in China or on all overseas investments.
Foreign investment is an inevitable trend of the economic development process, when the investment environment changes the cost of production factors and basic conditions for industrial development. These economic dynamics should not be put under government control.
Fourth, Taiwanese investments in China raise economic and political issues of concern to many people here. Some worry that such investments will lead to the export of local industries or challenge the survival of such industries by importing lower-priced products back to Taiwan. Others fear these investments threatened national security due to the political uncertainties caused by cross-strait tensions.
In fact, by improving the investment environment in Taiwan, we can dispel concerns about the weakening of local industries. By easing cross-strait hostilities to reduce political obstacles to economic development, we can avoid damaging our national security. Using a national security tax as a political tool to guarantee Taiwan's security will just not work.
Nevertheless, this doesn't mean that the government should let Taiwanese businesses in China run their own course. Most economists agree that economic problems should be solved through economic means. Therefore, I suggest our government set up a foreign investment protection system to spread out the investment risks of Taiwanese businesses in China.
First, the Ministry of Economic Affairs should establish an organization to take charge of "foreign investment insurance," providing coverage to Taiwanese businesses investing overseas. These businesses should be free to decide whether to participate depending on the countries or the areas of investment. Coverage should be limited to losses due to political factors. Losses caused by market factors or mismanagement should be excluded.
The ministry's organization would submit compensation claims to governments which are responsible for the losses. Supporting measures should be used as a card in negotiations over reasonable compensation and solutions.
The supporting measures would be Taiwan's economic cooperation and foreign aid. The international cooperation department of the Ministry of Economic Affairs is in charge of providing economic aid to friendly developing countries.
At present, legal restrictions bar economic aid to China. But if we can revise the law to include developing countries which have responded positively to Taiwan as aid recipients, then China would legitimately become eligible for such aid, if they choose to accept it.
I have to make it clear here that economic aid to China by no means equals "financing communist bandits." This is just a way for us to show our goodwill in promoting cross-strait economic cooperation and exchanges.
Besides, easing tensions between Taipei and Beijing is also economically beneficial. We have to keep in mind that Taiwan has an annual trade surplus with China that runs as high as US$15 billion. So it should be acceptable for Taiwan to provide US$100 million in economic aid to China every year to demonstrate our willingness to improve cross-strait economic prospects.
The problem now is that the current scale of the fund for international economic cooperation development is not suffi-cient. As a result, I suggest adding another US$1 billion to supplement it.
When Taiwan businesses in China suffer losses due to local politics and Chinese authorities deny our requests for compensation, we should stop our economic aid and cooperation projects, resuming them only after Beijing takes action to provide a reasonable solution and compensation. This insurance system could also be applied to Taiwanese businesses investing in other foreign countries as well.
Tsai Tsung-Hsi is an associate professor in the department of economics at the Chinese Culture University.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s