Before the presidential election, four candidates out of five proposed social welfare policies. That would have appeared to indicate that social welfare would be a major campaign issue. Unfortunately, none of the candidates really put much emphasis on social welfare and, therefore, there was not enough lively debate on the issue.
In retrospect, it is easly to see that more elections will generate more issues and political views as well as more promises on social welfare -- which corresponds to the in-depth observations of foreign scholars that political democratization in East Asia is helpful in stimulating the expansion of welfare policies.
However, when it comes to making good on election promises, we have to wait to see if the winning party was truely sincere about its platform proposals.
Chen Shui-bian
Chen's proposed "333 projects" (333
At present, Chen's government will soon be on track. In addition to the controversial Fourth Nuclear Power Plant and "anti-black-gold" politics, new visions for social welfare will inevitably draw more attention and demands in the near future.
Taiwan's social welfare has been "expanding," which is necessary when viewed from prevalent deficiencies and special favors given to government and education sector employees. Expansion has not resulted in fiscal deficits, nor will excessive welfare policies result in unwholesome social trends -- as people from political and business circles have said.
However, there should be appropriate limits to the idea of welfare "expansion." To set limits, we need to have clearer definitions of categories in social welfare as well as a consensus on such definitions, especially in the government's responsibility.
From the outset, the incoming government should have a once-and-for-all discussion and make a decision on the responsibilities of the government and the business sector, the obligations of the individual and the role to be played by the community and local welfare groups.
Only by doing so can social welfare stop being just an election issue or a bargaining chip in power struggles. Only then can we avoid seeing welfare downplayed and described as an extra burden for the government -- instead of being treated as an appropriate function. And of course, this will prevent excuses for delaying welfare spending, including those about such spending "crowding out other government budgets."
My vision of social welfare for the incoming government is not subsidies designed to please voters, but a blueprint with long-term goals and a package of workable welfare fiscal planning -- both are used to reach a consensus on implementing policies. The "new meaning" of new welfare lies here.
For the past 10 years, the outgoing KMT government has dedicated itself to expanding welfare policies and measures. But on the other hand, it has lacked a long-term vision for its policies.
The incoming DPP government should not go back to the KMT's appearance of having a benevolent policy while lacking in overall planning and rational regulations.
Michael Hsiao is currently a research fellow at the Institute of Sociology at the Academia Sinica.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath