The KMT experienced two crushing defeats during the past half century. First, it was defeated in civil war by the Chinese Communist Party, ending its rule over China. It then suffered a devastating political defeat against the DPP in this recent presidential election, and lost its rule over Taiwan.
In the first few years after its retreat to Taiwan, the KMT deluded itself and others with counterattack and restoration slogans. These slogans were repeated every day, as if the Communist Party would collapse if everyone called out the slogans loud enough. However, after decades of slogans, the KMT remains unable to take back China.
In the first month following its election defeat, the KMT headquarters was besieged by mobs for several days. Criticism against members of its Central Standing Committee snowballed. The party's chairman, Lee Teng-hui (李登輝), was forced to step down. All party leaders put on sad and pathetic faces.
The KMT's reaction to failure has remained the same for the past 50 years. Chiang Kai-shek (
However, those key players in its reform efforts, including Lien, all look so deflated and exhausted from their defeat. Their voices lack power. One cannot help but wonder how they would reform others when they look like the ones who need reform the most.
Those reform ceremonies; the endless seminars and discussions, are merely show. Plus, the reform conference has become a "venting" session. Many people feel fulfilled so long as they get a chance to curse Lee's name loudly. They feel that they have done their job as long as they say a few empty words about democracy.
But exactly how will the KMT carry out reform? No one in the KMT knows. Everyone is clueless. If you ask them "will the party chairman be elected by popular election," they will tell you "it is hard to say." If you ask them "whether the Central Standing Committee is being eliminated," their answer is the same. Ask them, "will the nature of the party will changed," the answer is "no." Obviously, the so-called "reformers" do not intend to reform at all. Quite possibly, the reform proposal submitted by the KMT in the days to come will be nothing but empty talk.
Even more absurd is that former chairman, Lee, actually had the naive idea that a change of party name will substantively change the KMT. If a person who has failed does not change from within and instead changes his or her name, he or she is still a failure.
After the US' Republican Party lost the last presidential election, it only changed its policies, not its name. No one would suggest that changing its name alone would bring victory in the next election. Does the KMT really expect the people to forget its old name or their views about the KMT by renaming it? Obviously, the KMT lost its brain along with the election.
The KMT has made a mess in Taiwan since March. The elimination of the National Assembly may have pleased some people, but it virtually drove people crazy. A climatic ending was finally reached with the Assembly's elimination. No wonder some people seem to have been driven up the wall.
If the fiasco keeps up, the KMT will sooner or later completely screw itself up. It wouldn't surprise anyone if the name "KMT" becomes a mere memory.
Wang Chien-chuang is the president of The Journalist magazine.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath