After yesterday's photo opportunity for the newly completed Cabinet, we are finally able to see quite literally what the new team looks like.
It differs from all previous ones in many significant respects, which could have an impact on the tone of policy. In the first place, although President-elect Chen Shui-bian (
Most significantly, this is the first time that the members are so widely distributed in party affiliation. Although the DPP holds the largest share, as would be expected, there are many KMT members, including, of course, Premier-designate Tang Fei (
Many KMT members have criticized the new team on exactly this point. They argue that, unless there is a genuine coalition government (in which, not incidentally, the KMT's legislative majority would entitle it to primary control), it is not appropriate for their members to participate in what is, after all, a Cabinet still largely directed by Chen. But this seems to be a case of sour grapes, part of the teething pains of the KMT's adjustment to life in opposition. From a broader point of view, Chen's consensus-building effort is to be commended, considering the delicacy of this first-ever transfer of power. Furthermore, if anything, it should be a part affirmation for the KMT that some of its members are not only very competent, but trusted to put the national interest ahead of the party's. Given the KMT's history of confusing this issue, this fact speaks volumes about the distance the party has travelled.
But criticism from the opposition parties is to be welcomed. The new environment demands that the legislators, and especially the opposition party caucuses, put forward focused criticism of government policies, and eventually articulate clear alternative platforms. Their success or failure in next year's legislative elections will depend primarily on this.
For the government, the biggest challenge will be whether all these people from such different backgrounds will be able to work together effectively. For this is also the first time in Taiwan's history that the Cabinet will act as the highest executive decision-making body in the country. The members of all previous governments were in fact selected by the Central Standing Committee (CSC) of the KMT and the coordination of the KMT acted as a "glue" holding them together. For example, serious conflicts between ministries could be -- and were -- referred to the CSC to resolve. The CSC also pulled ministers out of confrontations not only with the KMT-dominated legislature, but also with major business interests (the case of the resolution of the cable licensing war being a notable example).
The new government will have none of this backup. It will have to settle its own disputes -- and this is likely to be the major task for Tang, and perhaps Chen himself -- and it will have to develop the will and the capacity to deal with the legislature and other outside forces. And the media can certainly be counted on to pounce on and magnify every hint of discord. It may be a rough ride, but Taiwan's political system should emerge healthier from the process.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s