The US government wasted little time in imposing safeguards for the country's textile manufacturers as they struggle to compete with a flood of new Chinese textile imports.
On Wednesday, the Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements (CITA), which the Department of Commerce chairs, added new categories of textile products to an already growing list of other textile products listed for protection last week.
The decisions are the US response to the expiration of WTO export quotas at the beginning of this year, which had effectively supported smaller textile industries around the world and limited giant producers such as China in what they could export. Since the expiration, total textile imports from China have increased 63 percent in the first quarter of the year compared to the same period last year, according to an estimate from the American Manufacturing Trade Action Coalition (AMTAC).
ILLUSTRATION: MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
But the new CITA limits, imposed in record time, specifically address categories of textiles where Chinese imports have soared up to 16 times in that short time, according to the National Council of Textile Organizations (NCTO).
Last week's ruling involved cotton knit shirts and blouses, cotton trousers, and cotton and man-made fiber underwear and the new safeguards approved on Wednesday would also protect shirts and trousers in other categories.
Secretary of Commerce Carlos Gutierrez said the decision to impose safeguards was made "based on market disruption and threat of market disruption due to the magnitude of increases in textile imports from China and China's significant capacity to increase production and exports to the US in these product categories."
He said putting up the safeguards shows that the US is committed to "leveling the playing field for US industry by enforcing our trade agreements."
But Senator Charles Schumer, an outspoken critic of China's trade policies, said he does not think that the department's actions go far enough.
"I don't think that answers the issue," Schumer said. "I don't think you look at this on a piece-by-piece basis. I think you look at the whole thing."
Senator Richard Burr, a Republican from North Carolina, which has a large textile industry and has been hit hard by the decline of domestic production, said the US puts together trade agreements "to transition to a predictable future and any time anybody doesn't play by the rules then that makes the future less predictable. I think that is the purpose of the safeguards."
Burr said he has urged the Commerce Department "to be vigilant from a standpoint of all the categories and if there is abuse by China or any other trading partner, we need to use the tools that we have to make sure that people live by the agreement."
Last week's safeguards were granted after an inflexible 30-day comment period ended May 9. But while CITA by law has up to 60 days to make its decision, it in fact acted within three days when it released its first set of decisions last week -- a performance that NCTO head Cass Johnson said was the fastest on record.
"Do you think that their minds were made up?" asked Laura Jones, executive director of the US Association of Importers of Textiles and Apparel.
Jones said it remains to be seen what the impact of the lifting of the quotas and imposing of safeguards will have in the long run, arguing that stakeholders are in a wait-and-see pattern to determine how the issue plays out.
But Johnson said putting in place safeguards would help US manufacturers and workers.
"The fast action to reimpose quotas by the Bush administration today has saved thousands of textile jobs in this country and we are extremely grateful," he said. "By expediting its decision-making process and moving quickly to impose safeguards, the US government sent a strong message that it understands the real crisis that these enormous surges present to our workers."
In another phenomenon that marked the quick US reaction, organized labor and US business groups, which rarely see eye to eye, are walking in lock step on the issue of textile imports from China.
Scott Paul, a legislative representative of the AFL-CIO said there "was a great amount of evidence that the lifting of the quotas harmed tens of thousands of workers in the US" and in other countries. He believed the action was "long overdue" and might be "too little, too late" to help thousands of workers.
US industry groups say China's illegal subsidies and currency manipulation are to blame for China's ability to flood the world's markets with textiles. On Tuesday, the US Treasury Department sharpened its message on the currency issue, and warned that China's practice of pegging the yuan to the dollar was "distortionary."
NCTO said that since the quotas were eliminated, more than 16,000 workers lost their jobs. The American Manufacturing Trade Action Coalition estimated that the industry has lost nearly 400,000 jobs, or 36.4 percent of the total workforce, since January 2001.
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
RSS