The US government wasted little time in imposing safeguards for the country's textile manufacturers as they struggle to compete with a flood of new Chinese textile imports.
On Wednesday, the Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements (CITA), which the Department of Commerce chairs, added new categories of textile products to an already growing list of other textile products listed for protection last week.
The decisions are the US response to the expiration of WTO export quotas at the beginning of this year, which had effectively supported smaller textile industries around the world and limited giant producers such as China in what they could export. Since the expiration, total textile imports from China have increased 63 percent in the first quarter of the year compared to the same period last year, according to an estimate from the American Manufacturing Trade Action Coalition (AMTAC).
ILLUSTRATION: MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
But the new CITA limits, imposed in record time, specifically address categories of textiles where Chinese imports have soared up to 16 times in that short time, according to the National Council of Textile Organizations (NCTO).
Last week's ruling involved cotton knit shirts and blouses, cotton trousers, and cotton and man-made fiber underwear and the new safeguards approved on Wednesday would also protect shirts and trousers in other categories.
Secretary of Commerce Carlos Gutierrez said the decision to impose safeguards was made "based on market disruption and threat of market disruption due to the magnitude of increases in textile imports from China and China's significant capacity to increase production and exports to the US in these product categories."
He said putting up the safeguards shows that the US is committed to "leveling the playing field for US industry by enforcing our trade agreements."
But Senator Charles Schumer, an outspoken critic of China's trade policies, said he does not think that the department's actions go far enough.
"I don't think that answers the issue," Schumer said. "I don't think you look at this on a piece-by-piece basis. I think you look at the whole thing."
Senator Richard Burr, a Republican from North Carolina, which has a large textile industry and has been hit hard by the decline of domestic production, said the US puts together trade agreements "to transition to a predictable future and any time anybody doesn't play by the rules then that makes the future less predictable. I think that is the purpose of the safeguards."
Burr said he has urged the Commerce Department "to be vigilant from a standpoint of all the categories and if there is abuse by China or any other trading partner, we need to use the tools that we have to make sure that people live by the agreement."
Last week's safeguards were granted after an inflexible 30-day comment period ended May 9. But while CITA by law has up to 60 days to make its decision, it in fact acted within three days when it released its first set of decisions last week -- a performance that NCTO head Cass Johnson said was the fastest on record.
"Do you think that their minds were made up?" asked Laura Jones, executive director of the US Association of Importers of Textiles and Apparel.
Jones said it remains to be seen what the impact of the lifting of the quotas and imposing of safeguards will have in the long run, arguing that stakeholders are in a wait-and-see pattern to determine how the issue plays out.
But Johnson said putting in place safeguards would help US manufacturers and workers.
"The fast action to reimpose quotas by the Bush administration today has saved thousands of textile jobs in this country and we are extremely grateful," he said. "By expediting its decision-making process and moving quickly to impose safeguards, the US government sent a strong message that it understands the real crisis that these enormous surges present to our workers."
In another phenomenon that marked the quick US reaction, organized labor and US business groups, which rarely see eye to eye, are walking in lock step on the issue of textile imports from China.
Scott Paul, a legislative representative of the AFL-CIO said there "was a great amount of evidence that the lifting of the quotas harmed tens of thousands of workers in the US" and in other countries. He believed the action was "long overdue" and might be "too little, too late" to help thousands of workers.
US industry groups say China's illegal subsidies and currency manipulation are to blame for China's ability to flood the world's markets with textiles. On Tuesday, the US Treasury Department sharpened its message on the currency issue, and warned that China's practice of pegging the yuan to the dollar was "distortionary."
NCTO said that since the quotas were eliminated, more than 16,000 workers lost their jobs. The American Manufacturing Trade Action Coalition estimated that the industry has lost nearly 400,000 jobs, or 36.4 percent of the total workforce, since January 2001.
Father’s Day, as celebrated around the world, has its roots in the early 20th century US. In 1910, the state of Washington marked the world’s first official Father’s Day. Later, in 1972, then-US president Richard Nixon signed a proclamation establishing the third Sunday of June as a national holiday honoring fathers. Many countries have since followed suit, adopting the same date. In Taiwan, the celebration takes a different form — both in timing and meaning. Taiwan’s Father’s Day falls on Aug. 8, a date chosen not for historical events, but for the beauty of language. In Mandarin, “eight eight” is pronounced
In a recent essay, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” a former adviser to US President Donald Trump, Christian Whiton, accuses Taiwan of diplomatic incompetence — claiming Taipei failed to reach out to Trump, botched trade negotiations and mishandled its defense posture. Whiton’s narrative overlooks a fundamental truth: Taiwan was never in a position to “win” Trump’s favor in the first place. The playing field was asymmetrical from the outset, dominated by a transactional US president on one side and the looming threat of Chinese coercion on the other. From the outset of his second term, which began in January, Trump reaffirmed his
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
It is difficult to think of an issue that has monopolized political commentary as intensely as the recall movement and the autopsy of the July 26 failures. These commentaries have come from diverse sources within Taiwan and abroad, from local Taiwanese members of the public and academics, foreign academics resident in Taiwan, and overseas Taiwanese working in US universities. There is a lack of consensus that Taiwan’s democracy is either dying in ashes or has become a phoenix rising from the ashes, nurtured into existence by civic groups and rational voters. There are narratives of extreme polarization and an alarming
RSS