Over the past two weeks, anti-Japanese demonstrations have expanded from Beijing to Shanghai, Guangdong and other cities across China. The targets have also expanded from the Japanese embassy to businesses and expatriates. This is the most severe crisis in Sino-Japanese relations since the two countries established diplomatic ties in 1972.
Although Chinese Foreign Minister Li Zhaoxing (
The demonstrations indicate heightened Chinese nationalism. China suffered almost a century of bullying and humiliation at the hands of other nations, and has been through over 60 years of communist upheaval. Now, with its rapid military and economic growth, China seems like an impetuous young man who has yet to learn to control his temper and his strength.
But Tokyo's whitewashing of its wartime atrocities is the fuse that set off an explosion of Chinese nationalism. The protesters who have taken to the streets over the last two weeks are young Chinese, too young to have lived through World War II. Their hatred of the Japanese is a product of media manipulation and indoctrination -- aided by the Internet and other high-tech media.
The Chinese government does not usually allow people to voice their opinions and has clamped down on large-scale demonstrations such as the Tiananmen Square protests in 1989 and the Falun Gong movement. Although Beijing has mobilized police to maintain public order, popular sentiment has run so high that even the limited police presence has had little effect. This is why Tokyo believes that Beijing may have given tacit approval for the protests.
Although the Chinese government may be using the demonstrations as a vent for popular discontent, it must stop them from getting out of control. In 2003, there was a total of 58,000 protests in China, an average of 160 a day. The scale of the protests and the frequency with which the government has been their target have also increased. China is under enormous internal pressure on issues ranging from corruption and ethnic conflicts to disparity of economic development and social injustice. Any single protest could spiral out of control and become a national movement that Beijing cannot contain.
If the anti-Japanese riots continue, will Beijing be able to guarantee that the target of the demonstrators will not shift and that the rallies will not get out of control? Surely this consideration will make all foreign businesspeople fearful. Beijing should bring a halt to the anti-Japanese demonstrations and deal with the issue itself, rather than relying on popular pressure.
Tokyo should understand the perspective and feelings of those nations that suffered under Japanese occupation during the war, and reconsider its decision to revise its textbooks. Japan should follow Germany's example and face up to the injury it inflicted during the war, so that its people can learn from history and develop a peaceful spirit that abhors and seeks to avoid armed conflict.
The Chinese and Japanese foreign ministers have already missed one opportunity to resolve this problem. Coming up are the commemoration of the May 4 protests against the Versailles Conference, Victory over Japan (VJ) Day as well as a UN General Assembly meeting. Any of these occasions may give rise to additional tensions.
If this problem is not sorted out quickly and rationally it will become much more serious. China will face increased domestic pressure, as well as suspicion from the international community, while Japan will face damage to its huge investments in China. Both parties will suffer, and the international repercussions could be immense.
The White House’s decision to take a 9.9 percent stake in Intel Corp is looking like very shrewd business indeed. Since the government bought in at US$20.47 a share last August, the US chipmaker’s surging stock price has delivered the US a US$43 billion return. One of the reasons the investment has so far proved so sound is that the White House has made sure of it. According to The Wall Street Journal, Howard personally pushed deals on Intel’s behalf with some of the most lucrative clients imaginable. They include Nvidia Corp, the company at the heart of the AI
A single photograph can cut through a lot of noise, but it can also be used to misrepresent the truth. At the very least, it can concentrate the mind on something that requires further investigation. On Monday last week, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation CEO Tai Hsia-ling (戴遐齡) and former National Security Council secretary-general King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) held a news conference in which they showed a photograph of former foundation CEO Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑), now Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) deputy chairman. In the image Hsiao is seated next to Xiamen Taiwan Businessmen Association chairman Han Ying-huan (韓螢煥). The two men were holding
I first met Professor Ray Jiing (井迎瑞) as a film and documentary student at Shih Hsin University’s (SHU) Department of Radio Television and Film in 1988. The following year, he went on to become the director of the Chinese Taipei Film Archive — forerunner of the Taiwan Film and Audiovisual Institute (TFAI). Over his eight-year tenure, Jiing rescued and restored over 200 classic Taiwanese films. In 1997, he established the Graduate Institute of Studies in Documentary and Film Archiving at Tainan National University of the Arts (TNNUA), and I joined the program in his third cohort of students. Beyond a
President William Lai Ching-te’s (賴清德) May 20 second-anniversary address was not just a routine policy review; it was damage control. US President Donald Trump’s remarks — that he did not want to see anyone move toward independence and that the delivery of a major Taiwan arms package could depend on the progress of US-China relations — unsettled Taiwan’s public and created an opening for opposition parties to question whether Taiwan was being treated as a bargaining chip in Washington’s dealings with Beijing. Lai’s speech was designed to close that opening. The address covered the expected ground: sovereignty, cross-strait relations, defense spending,
RSS