Former secretary general of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Zhao Ziyang (趙紫陽), who was removed from the government 15 years ago, has passed away. His passing is a sensitive political issue, for Zhao's fate underlines the high degree of instability in China's government and the international commu-nity's hope for reform in China. For this very reason, it is likely that the government will ban any public commemorative activities.
The tight control that the government will likely exercise, coupled with the fact that Zhao has been out of office for the last 15 years, make it very unlikely that there will be a repetition of the 1989 Tiananmen Incident, which was sparked by the death of another party general secretary, Hu Yaobang (
But with the contradictions within Chinese society becoming increasingly fraught, people are now urgently seeking an outlet for their social discontent, so it is likely that there will be scattered commemorative events, and possibly even protests, organized by laborers and urban communities.
Whether these scattered events will converge into a larger social movement will depend largely on the attitude of the authorities. The harder they seek to prevent any commemorative activity, the more likely it is that there will be a powerful social reaction.
We can also expect that Zhao's death will prompt a wave of interest in Zhao as a person, as well as a revisiting of the Tian-anmen Incident, especially by academics based overseas. This will indirectly affect the atmosphere in the CCP.
It is worth noting that Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) was formerly Zhao's secretary, and even accompanied him when he spoke with the students in Tiananmen Square. Wen's attitude toward his mentor will be an important index of his character, especially in Chinese society, with its emphasis on repaying the kindness of others.
Under the Communist system, Zhao played a tragic role. Similar examples abound in the history of the CCP. For such people, early political choices become a fatal error of judgement. When they realize what has happened, it is already too late, and they have turned into a type of person hateful to themselves, the sort of person they wished to overthrow when they first joined the revolution. Is there anything more tragic?
By 1989, Zhao had already perceived the CCP's inborn resistance to democracy. The party that deprived him of his liberty and erased all trace of his contributions, was the party to which he had dedicated his life. The pain that Zhao must have felt is not something that we can easily comprehend.
Zhao's death offers us an opportunity to re-evaluate the true face of China. During Zhao's time, reform was regarded as encompassing the whole spectrum of life, even including political issues. But reform today has become restricted to the economic sphere. This will create problems.
Political, social, educational and cultural development simply cannot keep pace with China's economic development, and this will lead to imbalance. This is the true face of China, and is also the root of its instability.
There are those who -- viewing China exclusively from an economic perspective -- believe that it can achieve stable development even without social and political reform. But this is only possible because of their narrow perspective.
We can in fact say that with Zhao's passing, true reform in China has died.
In China today, a superficial prosperity disguises a crisis in the very nature of the system. How long the crisis will remain hidden is another question.
Wang Dan was a student leader during the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests in Beijing.
TRANSLATED BY Ian Bartholomew
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
On May 13, the Legislative Yuan passed an amendment to Article 6 of the Nuclear Reactor Facilities Regulation Act (核子反應器設施管制法) that would extend the life of nuclear reactors from 40 to 60 years, thereby providing a legal basis for the extension or reactivation of nuclear power plants. On May 20, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) legislators used their numerical advantage to pass the TPP caucus’ proposal for a public referendum that would determine whether the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant should resume operations, provided it is deemed safe by the authorities. The Central Election Commission (CEC) has
When China passed its “Anti-Secession” Law in 2005, much of the democratic world saw it as yet another sign of Beijing’s authoritarianism, its contempt for international law and its aggressive posture toward Taiwan. Rightly so — on the surface. However, this move, often dismissed as a uniquely Chinese form of legal intimidation, echoes a legal and historical precedent rooted not in authoritarian tradition, but in US constitutional history. The Chinese “Anti-Secession” Law, a domestic statute threatening the use of force should Taiwan formally declare independence, is widely interpreted as an emblem of the Chinese Communist Party’s disregard for international norms. Critics
RSS