The hostage standoff in Beslan, Russia, ended in a siege by Russian special forces and many casualties. An authoritarian Russian Federation government led by Vladimir Putin versus a Chechen pro-independence terrorist group -- that's a combination that can only result in more deaths and an escalation of hostilities, with neither side willing to back down.
On the one side are radically militant terrorists who do not mind killing themselves and innocent bystanders, and hence often do not even have any "exit plan" in their terrorist attacks. They feel justified by what they think is a higher and noble cause -- to free Chechnya from Russian rule, an effort that began long before troops were ordered by Boris Yeltsin to invade Chechnya to keep it from becoming independent from Russia. They of course are wrong, because no amount of wrong on the part of one's enemy can justify terrorism -- especially when innocent people, children in particular, are killed as a result.
On the other side is Putin, who has a tough policy toward Chechen independence and terrorism, and has never made compromises in the face of terrorist demands. Moreover, the Russian Federation remains a state in which human rights and lives are not exactly valued as a top priority. Therefore, in the Dubrovka theater siege, the Russian special forces' Alfa Brigade deployed poison gas which successfully ended the standoff, but also took the lives of more than 100 hostages.
In the Beslan hostage-taking episode, Putin repeatedly said that his government would give top priority to the lives of the hostages. But the standoff nevertheless ended with a siege and mass bloodshed. The Russian government claims that the siege was not planned, and was only triggered when the terrorists began to fire shots at the hostages. But over the past 30 years, out of the twelve sieges that resulted in the most casualties, four were launched by Russia -- and not surprisingly, all four were related to Chechnya. So, in view of Russia's record in handling similar situations, it's no wonder that many feel skeptical. The European Union is among those demanding an explanation from the Russian government about how this could have happened.
What results is a seemingly never-ending series of terrorist attacks with high death counts, including the Beslan school episode, two Russian plane crashes, the bomb attack in the Russian metro station and the Dubrovka theater hostage standoff two years ago. The tragedies will more than likely repeat themselves, since no resolution of the issue of Chechen independence appears near.
With terrorism rapidly flowing across national borders and becoming an international rather than domestic problem, countries face a dilemma. It is important to keep in mind that refusing to give in to terrorists' demands often does not deter or discourage them, since unlike common criminals, they are often motivated by what they believe to be higher causes and ideals. Between a tough and uncompromising policy such as Russia's, which typically results in the loss of innocent lives, and caving in to terrorist demands -- which will only encourage more terrorist attacks over other supposedly noble causes -- no workable solution seems to exist.
One way to ease hostilities is to address root problems behind conflicts in accordance with universal principles of human rights and democracy. That is how Putin and his government can begin to deal more effectively with the situation -- instead of stubbornly claiming that Chechen independence is only an internal problem.
With each passing day, the threat of a People’s Republic of China (PRC) assault on Taiwan grows. Whatever one’s view about the history, there is essentially no question that a PRC conquest of Taiwan would mark the end of the autonomy and freedom enjoyed by the island’s 23 million people. Simply put, the PRC threat to Taiwan is genuinely existential for a free, democratic and autonomous Taiwan. Yet one might not know it from looking at Taiwan. For an island facing a threat so acute, lethal and imminent, Taiwan is showing an alarming lack of urgency in dramatically strengthening its defenses.
As India’s six-week-long general election grinds past the halfway mark, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s messaging has shifted from confident to shrill. After the first couple of phases of polling showed a 3 percentage point drop in turnout, Modi and his party leaders have largely stopped promoting their accomplishments of the past 10 years — or, for that matter, the “Modi guarantees” offered in the Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) manifesto for the next five. Instead, making the majority Hindu population fear and loathe Muslims seems to be the BJP’s preferred talking point. Modi went on the offensive in an April 21
The people of Taiwan recently received confirmation of the strength of American support for their security. Of four foreign aid bills that Congress passed and President Biden signed in April, the bill legislating additional support for Taiwan garnered the most votes. Three hundred eighty-five members of the House of Representatives voted to provide foreign military financing to Taiwan versus only 34 against. More members of Congress voted to support Taiwan than Ukraine, Israel, or banning TikTok. There was scant debate over whether the United States should provide greater support for Taiwan. It was understood and broadly accepted that doing so
I still remember the first time I heard about the possibility of an invasion by China. I was six years old. I thought war was coming and hid in my bed, scared. After 18 years, the invasion news tastes like a sandwich I eat every morning. As a Gen Z Taiwanese student who has witnessed China’s harassment for more than 20 years, I want to share my opinion on China. Every generation goes through different events. I have seen not only the norms of China’s constant presence, but also the Sunflower movement, wars and people fighting over peace or equality,