I still remember the first time I heard about the possibility of an invasion by China. I was six years old. I thought war was coming and hid in my bed, scared. After 18 years, the invasion news tastes like a sandwich I eat every morning. As a Gen Z Taiwanese student who has witnessed China’s harassment for more than 20 years, I want to share my opinion on China.
Every generation goes through different events. I have seen not only the norms of China’s constant presence, but also the Sunflower movement, wars and people fighting over peace or equality, things that are becoming more common internationally.
Combined with my education and media influence, I am “naturally independent” with a high awareness of human rights, democracy and freedom. I see my national identity as Taiwanese without any doubt or pressure; I am proud to be Taiwanese.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) sees every incident as an opportunity. After the incident of two Chinese fishermen drowning in waters around Kinmen, the China Coast Guard used “gray zone” tactics, saying it was entering prohibited waters around Kinmen to protect Chinese fishers. This is highly political, which fits the CCP’s wish: Salami-slicing its way to more territorial claims. Its behavior lacks transparency and diplomacy. The CCP is a cunning opponent; we skate on thin ice every time an incident happens, and we are careful with how we respond.
The CCP has insisted that “Taiwan should be a part of China” since 1949. China and Taiwan have an abundance of shared history, culture, art and precious craftsmanship. These valued treasures are bequeathed by their ancestors. Why do we choose to inherit a grudge from the past, instead of those disappearing crafts that no one has an interest in passing down to the next generation?
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) says that “Beijing reserves the right to use military force to bring Taiwan into the fold,” a sentence that has the power to affect countless people’s lives. Sometimes I feel it is unfair. Why do I have to carry these negative feelings from an experience that I never had, suffering under the fear of war and of losing my family, friends and way of life?
So, what do we want? Non-interference like before, “one country two systems”? Maybe it would be nice to go back to the time when we traded peacefully with silence and acquiescence, but with the ambition of Xi and our next president, William Lai (賴清德), I do not think this can happen. This year might be the sticking point for Taiwan. There is a high chance China might attack, but after seeing how wars can change a society into a painful and vulnerable place, I believe no one wants it to happen, or to see Taiwan no longer have the human rights we should have.
I heard an elderly person criticize Gen Z for being too weak to fight. Having an awareness of human rights, democracy and freedom does not mean we do not want to defend our beautiful island. We believe there might be other ways that are more civilized or peaceful to do so, instead of people losing their homes and families, and living in fear. It is just that so far we do not know what exactly it is we can do. I guess we could leave the issue to our future selves. We are not yet ready, but we have been keeping our eyes on every little piece of clues, because we want to fix the problem so this generation is the last to suffer, giving future generations a peaceful society.
Rather than holding a grudge, I prefer to pass down the appreciation of lives, the gratitude of knowledge and openness to my children. It makes no sense to allow future generations to be caught forever in this loop.
Huang Chieh-hsuan is a student in the Department of International Affairs at Wenzao Ursuline University of Languages.
Taiwan should reject two flawed answers to the Eswatini controversy: that diplomatic allies no longer matter, or that they must be preserved at any cost. The sustainable answer is to maintain formal diplomatic relations while redesigning development relationships around transparency, local ownership and democratic accountability. President William Lai’s (賴清德) canceled trip to Eswatini has elicited two predictable reactions in Taiwan. One camp has argued that the episode proves Taiwan must double down on support for every remaining diplomatic ally, because Beijing is tightening the screws, and formal recognition is too scarce to risk. The other says the opposite: If maintaining
India’s semiconductor strategy is undergoing a quiet, but significant, recalibration. With the rollout of India Semiconductor Mission (ISM) 2.0, New Delhi is signaling a shift away from ambition-driven leaps toward a more grounded, capability-led approach rooted in industrial realities and institutional learning. Rather than attempting to enter the most advanced nodes immediately, India has chosen to prioritize mature technologies in the 28-nanometer to 65-nanometer range. That would not be a retreat, but a strategic alignment with domestic capabilities, market demand and global supply chain gaps. The shift carries the imprimatur of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, indicating that the recalibration is
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), during an interview for the podcast Lanshuan Time (蘭萱時間) released on Monday, said that a US professor had said that she deserved to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize following her meeting earlier this month with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Cheng’s “journey of peace” has garnered attention from overseas and from within Taiwan. The latest My Formosa poll, conducted last week after the Cheng-Xi meeting, shows that Cheng’s approval rating is 31.5 percent, up 7.6 percentage points compared with the month before. The same poll showed that 44.5 percent of respondents
China last week announced that it picked two Pakistani astronauts for its Tiangong space station mission, indicating the maturation of the two nations’ relationship from terrestrial infrastructure cooperation to extraterrestrial strategic domains. For Taiwan and India, the developments present an opportunity for democratic collaboration in space, particularly regarding dual-use technologies and the normative frameworks for outer space governance. Sino-Pakistani space cooperation dates back to the end of the Cold War in the 1990s, with a cooperative agreement between the Pakistani Space & Upper Atmosphere Research Commission, and the Chinese Ministry of Aerospace Industry. Space cooperation was integrated into the China-Pakistan
RSS