Taiwan is confronting escalating threats from its behemoth neighbor. Last month, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army conducted live-fire drills in the East China Sea, practicing blockades and precision strikes on simulated targets, while its escalating cyberattacks targeting government, financial and telecommunication systems threaten to disrupt Taiwan’s digital infrastructure.
The mounting geopolitical pressure underscores Taiwan’s need to strengthen its defense capabilities to deter possible aggression and improve civilian preparedness. The consequences of inadequate preparation have been made all too clear by the tragic situation in Ukraine. Taiwan can build on its successful COVID-19 response, marked by effective planning and execution, to enhance its civilian resilience.
President William Lai (賴清德) has prioritized national preparedness by setting up the Whole-of-Society Defense Resilience Committee. In December last year, the Presidential Office held its first tabletop exercise, simulating Chinese escalation to improve government coordination and civil society response.
The first city-wide field exercise was held in Tainan on March 27. Lai observed the event, coordinating central and local government agencies, including a medical command center and trauma treatment areas.
Kaohsiung Mayor Chen Chi-mai (陳其邁) is developing a smart city model to maintain city-wide stability. In Taipei, Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) has advanced disaster response drills to prepare residents for evacuations. Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) employs technology to bolster energy and cybersecurity. Such civilian preparedness work is expanding to enhance cities’ resilience capacity.
Structured simulations with military planners are also needed to test civilian preparedness. Tabletop exercises promote collaborative problem-solving.
Unlike typical defense studies, work under way at Stanford University’s Department of Health Policy, in partnership with the Hoover Institution and the RAND Corp, focuses on civilian well-being, especially children and women, modeling health system capacity, supply chain reliability, and community stability for naval blockades, among other conflict scenarios.
Different types of naval blockades require different stockpiles of food, water, medical and energy supplies. A direct military invasion would require evacuation facilities, civilian force utilization, trauma treatment centers and temporary housing.
Translating simulations and modeling to civilian response needs builds awareness and confidence, facilitates civilian training and provide insights to civilian leaders in planning, including protecting and acquiring critical infrastructure and supplies.
Awareness is the first step. Taiwan’s collective preparedness efforts would signal a broader lesson for democracies facing aggression. Unclassified war games from US think tanks and other groups highlight the severe costs of a Chinese invasion — casualties, economic disruption and global trade impacts — but indicate that Taiwan could endure.
Taiwan’s plan to withstand mounting geopolitical escalation could provide practical lessons for countries such as the Philippines, which faces Chinese aggression in the South China Sea. By leveraging its proven COVID-19 response, Taiwan can continue to lead in disaster preparedness and resilience to protect its citizens against Chinese coercion.
Ruth M. Gibson is a postdoctoral fellow in Stanford University’s Department of Health Policy. Kharis Templeman is director of the Hoover Institution Project on Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region. Jason Wang is director of the Center for Policy, Outcomes and Prevention at Stanford University.
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) held a news conference to celebrate his party’s success in surviving Saturday’s mass recall vote, shortly after the final results were confirmed. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would have much preferred a different result, it was not a defeat for the DPP in the same sense that it was a victory for the KMT: Only KMT legislators were facing recalls. That alone should have given Chu cause to reflect, acknowledge any fault, or perhaps even consider apologizing to his party and the nation. However, based on his speech, Chu showed
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
RSS