Taiwan is confronting escalating threats from its behemoth neighbor. Last month, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army conducted live-fire drills in the East China Sea, practicing blockades and precision strikes on simulated targets, while its escalating cyberattacks targeting government, financial and telecommunication systems threaten to disrupt Taiwan’s digital infrastructure.
The mounting geopolitical pressure underscores Taiwan’s need to strengthen its defense capabilities to deter possible aggression and improve civilian preparedness. The consequences of inadequate preparation have been made all too clear by the tragic situation in Ukraine. Taiwan can build on its successful COVID-19 response, marked by effective planning and execution, to enhance its civilian resilience.
President William Lai (賴清德) has prioritized national preparedness by setting up the Whole-of-Society Defense Resilience Committee. In December last year, the Presidential Office held its first tabletop exercise, simulating Chinese escalation to improve government coordination and civil society response.
The first city-wide field exercise was held in Tainan on March 27. Lai observed the event, coordinating central and local government agencies, including a medical command center and trauma treatment areas.
Kaohsiung Mayor Chen Chi-mai (陳其邁) is developing a smart city model to maintain city-wide stability. In Taipei, Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) has advanced disaster response drills to prepare residents for evacuations. Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) employs technology to bolster energy and cybersecurity. Such civilian preparedness work is expanding to enhance cities’ resilience capacity.
Structured simulations with military planners are also needed to test civilian preparedness. Tabletop exercises promote collaborative problem-solving.
Unlike typical defense studies, work under way at Stanford University’s Department of Health Policy, in partnership with the Hoover Institution and the RAND Corp, focuses on civilian well-being, especially children and women, modeling health system capacity, supply chain reliability, and community stability for naval blockades, among other conflict scenarios.
Different types of naval blockades require different stockpiles of food, water, medical and energy supplies. A direct military invasion would require evacuation facilities, civilian force utilization, trauma treatment centers and temporary housing.
Translating simulations and modeling to civilian response needs builds awareness and confidence, facilitates civilian training and provide insights to civilian leaders in planning, including protecting and acquiring critical infrastructure and supplies.
Awareness is the first step. Taiwan’s collective preparedness efforts would signal a broader lesson for democracies facing aggression. Unclassified war games from US think tanks and other groups highlight the severe costs of a Chinese invasion — casualties, economic disruption and global trade impacts — but indicate that Taiwan could endure.
Taiwan’s plan to withstand mounting geopolitical escalation could provide practical lessons for countries such as the Philippines, which faces Chinese aggression in the South China Sea. By leveraging its proven COVID-19 response, Taiwan can continue to lead in disaster preparedness and resilience to protect its citizens against Chinese coercion.
Ruth M. Gibson is a postdoctoral fellow in Stanford University’s Department of Health Policy. Kharis Templeman is director of the Hoover Institution Project on Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region. Jason Wang is director of the Center for Policy, Outcomes and Prevention at Stanford University.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of