In his nomination acceptance speech at the National Democratic Convention, US Senator John Kerry emphasized that he would only go to war if faced with "a threat that was real and imminent." He said he "will be a commander-in-chief who will never mislead us into war" and that "the United States of America never goes to war because we want to, we only go to war because we have to." I believe that Kerry's words prove that military thinking and military ethics are intricately linked with the stability of national security and the strategic situation.
The book Military Ethics published by the US's National Defense University pointed out that the American Catholic Bishop's Pastoral, in their discussion of the 1983 made-for-television film Day After Tomorrow indicated that many American people were concerned about issues related to the ethics of armed conflict.
In the aftermath of the recent military exercises by China, Taiwan and the US, it is important that we raise the issue of the ethics of conflict. We should also consider preventive defense, which consists of "softer" strategic options and provides a basis for reducing military tensions, by dispelling the increasingly dense atmosphere of imminent conflict to avoid an unintended conflagration.
Military Ethics emphasizes the deep strategic thinking behind the idea that soldiers who hold a position and await orders are also making a contribution. It expounds the value of a strong defensive stance and preventive action. It goes on to point out that the reason that the military exists is to protect the nation and prevent it from becoming a victim of the threats of its enemies.
We can see from its arguments that the US National Defense University sees the job of the military as guaranteeing peaceful development and stability. It proposes the idea that peace stems from restraint. Restraint is a form of endurance and self-discipline, but it is usually regarded as being "soft." In the past, soldiers have created an impression of fierceness and strength, but what we want to emphasize now is a restraint that serves people rather than brings them into conflict.
Military Ethics also points out that the reason the military is given the absolute right to use major weapons by society is because it can only use this force under conditions of the greatest restraint, and that the use of force must be preceded by the correct procedures and oversight. "Peace" is therefore a precondition for "using military force," which should only be used to give a guarantee of peace.
Peace and military action support each other. For without a foundation of peace, any conflict can bring on terrible dangers which will extend into the future. The results of the second Iraq war gives us a clear indication of what can happen without such a foundation.
It is better to avoid conflict than to seek it. Lightly starting a conflict is something that strategists have always sought to avoid, as they know it is unwise and likely to have bad results. Former US secretary of defense William Perry is a proponent of "preventive defense," which he regards as being analogous to preventive medicine. Preventive medicine supports health and preempts dangerous developments. Preventive defense seeks out defensive opportunities prior to any threat to US national security maturing, and maintaining the security of the US by avoiding crisis situations.
Taiwan is a small country with a large population and it has few strategic options. The government should inculcate the idea that "prevention is better than cure," and it should create space to maneuver by showing goodwill to all, establishing the idea of "seeking battle only after the victory has been won" and keeping the conflict outside the country. In this way it can achieve the strategic goals of prevention and restraint.
The nation's geographical location and conditions means that it has a certain strategic value and importance. In the face of the constantly changing international situation and the tricky nature of cross-strait relations, we should use preventive defense to peacefully resolve problems in their early stages, making use of "soft" national security strategies to open up international maneuverability and avoid any crisis that might give rise to conflict. This is the proper way to proceed.
In this age of advanced technology and information, military ethics and preventive defense are not rarified concepts which few can follow, nor do they ignore the current international scene. Their main purpose is to emphasize the importance of soft strategies of peace, ethics, restraint and prevention.
This can serve as a platform to achieve the ancient human ideals of ending war. And it is something to contemplate for China, the US and Taiwan -- who in their recent military exercises have been intent on confrontation and competition.
Li Hua-chiu is a part-time researcher with the National Policy Foundation.
Translated by Ian Bartholomew
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.