Due to the alarming environmental reports that started coming out at the time, the UN in 1983 appointed an international commission to propose strategies for sustainable development. This commission published a report four years later under the title "Our Common Future." The commission's work and its report have become landmarks by starting a process of drawing international attention to concern for the environment.
The main idea behind the report's title is very simple: The future of humanity has to be a common future, or it will have no future at all. The ecological crisis has such characteristics and is so widespread that to reach sustainable development for humanity on this planet, a common solution is required.
In the same way, the future of Taiwan is neither green nor blue, it is a common future or there will be no future at all. Taiwanese society has to be built in harmony, but respecting people's differences, so that it can become a pluralist and diverse society. This can be a nice platform for the next four years of DPP presidency; trying to reach a common vision on the future of this land that is shared by the majority of Taiwanese society.
Taiwan is a land where different cultures and races have flourished, yet not always in harmony. This variety, far for being a curse, is a blessing; a potential for inspiration and limitless creativity. True, there is a lot of work to do before we can reach a common vision, but this is supposed to be the actual work of authentic politicians: to work to gather the common expectations of society in a consensus instead of promoting (even allowing) division and confrontation.
This same idea of a common future is something that can be proposed to China. It is too soon to talk about independence or unification, but unquestionably the future of Taiwan is related to the future of China, it is a common future too, although not necessarily as the same country. Even if Taiwan becomes a nation free from the menace of subjugation by China -- that is, an independent nation internationally recognized as such -- its future will be likewise linked to its neighbors, and particularly to China.
China and Taiwan should sit down and draft together a common vision for the peoples of both nations, a road map open to different destinations, but under a common vehicle, that is, mutual respect, mutual recognition and non-violence. It should be time and the evolution of this correlation that finally drives the vehicle to its suitable destination; this may be two happy peoples under one great nation, or two happy peoples in two equally great nations; the end result will not matter, because both peoples would have discovered that their futures are tied together, because it is a common future in the community of the peoples of Earth.
"To keep options open for future generations, the present generation must begin now, and begin together, nationally and internationally," was the message of the "Our Common Future" report in 1987. Today the political leaders of Taiwan and China have a no less challenging task: to keep options open for future generations. I believe that President Chen Shui-bian (
Francisco Carin
Taishan, Taipei County
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS