Having agreed to give Hong Kong autonomy under a "one country, two systems" formula, Beijing finally showed its hand and ruled out elections there.
It is a weak and cowardly ruler who avoids universal suffrage. There has never been
and never will be a democratic communist government, simply because no sane citizenry would ever vote in favor of
a communist government. Communism is merely a tool of the dictator, a paternalistic regime based on the errant notion that an elite ruling class can best know how to take care of the "ignorant masses."
This is China in a nutshell. The dictators live in luxury while the peasants are kept in the dark, fed nonsense and taught lies about the Communist Party. There have been so many lies in Beijing for so long, no one remembers how to spell "truth."
This latest fiasco in Hong Kong must be a warning to the world about Taiwan and Tibet. China lies when it says it favors human rights and freedom. It lies when it says it respects freedom of religion. It lies when it says Taiwan is an errant province. It lies when it says it is merely "helping" Tibet's economy.
It lies when it says Hong Kong is governed by "one country, two systems." That is another communist lie -- there is no such system. There is one party in Hong Kong -- it is the Chinese Communist Party, and anyone else is "unpatriotic" and therefore disqualified.
The communist version of democracy is laughable. The Constitution of China is a joke. It is the binding of a book on the outside and empty pages on the inside. Communist China is a place where lying is the most sacred art. The communists have had over 50 years to practice lying, and they even lie to each other.
Sadly, they believe their own lies, and the people truly have suffered long for it.
Hwa Lee-long
United States
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS