"Charlie Allen had his hair on fire," wrote Richard Clarke, former US counterterrorism chief, opening a chapter in his brilliantly promoted best seller, Against All Enemies.
The author is attracted to that vivid figure of speech. Appearing on TV's "Meet the Press," Clarke recalled his application of the trope to the director of the Central Intelligence Agency: "I've used the phrase in the book to describe George Tenet's warnings as `He had his hair on fire.' He was about as excited as I've ever seen him."
Democratic members of the Sept. 11 commission also seized on the colorful phrase. Jamie Gorelick, a former Clinton Justice Department appointee, said that a look at the data in the summer of 2001 "would set your hair on fire, not just George Tenet's hair on fire." Richard Ben-Veniste, a leading Democratic lawyer, cited the phrase in his March 23 questioning of Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld: "People like Director Tenet, people like Richard Clarke, are running around, as they say, with their hair on fire." The Pentagon chief sought to place the suddenly favored phrase in perspective: "In three years since I've been back in the Pentagon, there have been people running around with their hair on fire a lot of times."
Whence this hirsute conflagration? From its context in the above usages, the meaning can be taken to be "in a state of extreme agitation," one stage above "wild-eyed" and just below "freaked out," or totally out of control.
The phrase is clearly figurative, not intended to be taken literally any more than "flipped his lid." The experience is associated with the adjective "hair-raising" but is far more emphatic. Its central semantic element is the dramatic visibility of the upset person's demeanor.
Outrageousness in describing outrage is the phrase's essence. In September 2002, when right-wing commentator Pat Buchanan launched a new magazine, The American Conservative, David Carr of The New York Times quoted Lucianne Goldberg, also a right-wing voice, as saying of Buchanan: "Amongst a certain group, Pat can do no wrong. He could appear nude, with Gloria Steinem, with his hair on fire, and they would still love him."
After the recent spate of usage, John Woestendiek of The Baltimore Sun found the phrase in James Joyce's 1939 novel Finnegans Wake: "The Flash that Flies from Vuggy's Eyes has Set Me Hair On Fire." The reporter noted that "ancient Buddhist wisdom ... holds that a person should seek enlightenment in the same way a person whose `hair is on fire' would seek water, meaning with the utmost urgency." More in line with today's sense of "highly excited," he found that in the 1986 movie Top Gun, a flight instructor says to the character played by Tom Cruise, "You're not going to be happy unless you're going Mach 2 with your hair on fire." One of the reporter's sources suggests the phrase originated in naval aviators' lingo; in that case, it would not be surprising if national security experts like Clarke and Rumsfeld were familiar with it.
However, further etymological digging by researcher Elizabeth Phillips reveals still earlier usage -- with a related meaning of "exhibiting excited enthusiasm" -- by a cantankerous conservative commentator with an abiding interest in the American language.
H.L. Mencken, in a July 27, 1931, column in The Baltimore Sun, was certain that the likely Democratic nominee for president, Franklin Roosevelt, would fail to unseat President Herbert Hoover. The Democrats, Mencken wrote, "lack a man of really heroic mold -- they have no one capable of capitalizing melodramatically [on] the popular disgust with Hoover, no one able to make the public heart leap and pant, no one sufficiently gaudy and inflammatory to set the public hair on fire."
Seven decades from now, some triumphalist right-wing columnist for NYTimes Global Streaming 3-D Multimedia may look back on our times and note that another conservative commentator was better at popular etymology than political prognostication.
Snared by loopmanship
"Was an Official in the Loop?" asked a recent New York Times headline. Elisabeth Bumiller reported that when Vice President Dick Cheney said Richard Clarke had been "out of the loop" -- not privy to the highest-level meetings of Bush administration principals -- national security adviser Condoleezza Rice countered that "I would not use the words `out of the loop.'" Her view was that the counterterrorism executive was "in the loop," construing the "loop" to be a level below that of the top security officials. Cheney's precise statement was that Clarke "wasn't in the loop, frankly, on a lot of this stuff ... he clearly missed a lot of what was going on." Journalists changed the negative "wasn't in the loop" to a positive "out of the loop," to which Rice responded; the distinction is worth noting.
Tourists visiting downtown Chicago ask, "Where is the Loop?" That term refers to the railway built around Chicago's business district by Charles Tyson Yerkes, a figurative use of the word for "a circle formed by a rope." The Lexicographic Irregular John Strother of Princeton, N.J., holds that the current extension of the metaphor is rooted in the feedback theory of electrical engineers and automation pioneers.
In the current political vernacular, in the loop is "in the know" -- privy to information kept not only from the general public but also from all but the "inner circle" (shaped like a loop) of a specific enterprise. To be out of the loop is to be uninformed, a position in which no power player likes to appear.
But not always. During the 1980s Iran-contra scandal, when the Reagan administration diverted funds to combat communism in Latin America, Vice President George Herbert Walker Bush denied any knowledge of the scheme, memorably declaring that he had been out of the loop and was thus untainted.
When in the loop means "those around the power center," presidential aides assert their presence in the circle; when it suggests a conspiracy, out of the loop is the safe place to be.
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
RSS