"Charlie Allen had his hair on fire," wrote Richard Clarke, former US counterterrorism chief, opening a chapter in his brilliantly promoted best seller, Against All Enemies.
The author is attracted to that vivid figure of speech. Appearing on TV's "Meet the Press," Clarke recalled his application of the trope to the director of the Central Intelligence Agency: "I've used the phrase in the book to describe George Tenet's warnings as `He had his hair on fire.' He was about as excited as I've ever seen him."
Democratic members of the Sept. 11 commission also seized on the colorful phrase. Jamie Gorelick, a former Clinton Justice Department appointee, said that a look at the data in the summer of 2001 "would set your hair on fire, not just George Tenet's hair on fire." Richard Ben-Veniste, a leading Democratic lawyer, cited the phrase in his March 23 questioning of Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld: "People like Director Tenet, people like Richard Clarke, are running around, as they say, with their hair on fire." The Pentagon chief sought to place the suddenly favored phrase in perspective: "In three years since I've been back in the Pentagon, there have been people running around with their hair on fire a lot of times."
Whence this hirsute conflagration? From its context in the above usages, the meaning can be taken to be "in a state of extreme agitation," one stage above "wild-eyed" and just below "freaked out," or totally out of control.
The phrase is clearly figurative, not intended to be taken literally any more than "flipped his lid." The experience is associated with the adjective "hair-raising" but is far more emphatic. Its central semantic element is the dramatic visibility of the upset person's demeanor.
Outrageousness in describing outrage is the phrase's essence. In September 2002, when right-wing commentator Pat Buchanan launched a new magazine, The American Conservative, David Carr of The New York Times quoted Lucianne Goldberg, also a right-wing voice, as saying of Buchanan: "Amongst a certain group, Pat can do no wrong. He could appear nude, with Gloria Steinem, with his hair on fire, and they would still love him."
After the recent spate of usage, John Woestendiek of The Baltimore Sun found the phrase in James Joyce's 1939 novel Finnegans Wake: "The Flash that Flies from Vuggy's Eyes has Set Me Hair On Fire." The reporter noted that "ancient Buddhist wisdom ... holds that a person should seek enlightenment in the same way a person whose `hair is on fire' would seek water, meaning with the utmost urgency." More in line with today's sense of "highly excited," he found that in the 1986 movie Top Gun, a flight instructor says to the character played by Tom Cruise, "You're not going to be happy unless you're going Mach 2 with your hair on fire." One of the reporter's sources suggests the phrase originated in naval aviators' lingo; in that case, it would not be surprising if national security experts like Clarke and Rumsfeld were familiar with it.
However, further etymological digging by researcher Elizabeth Phillips reveals still earlier usage -- with a related meaning of "exhibiting excited enthusiasm" -- by a cantankerous conservative commentator with an abiding interest in the American language.
H.L. Mencken, in a July 27, 1931, column in The Baltimore Sun, was certain that the likely Democratic nominee for president, Franklin Roosevelt, would fail to unseat President Herbert Hoover. The Democrats, Mencken wrote, "lack a man of really heroic mold -- they have no one capable of capitalizing melodramatically [on] the popular disgust with Hoover, no one able to make the public heart leap and pant, no one sufficiently gaudy and inflammatory to set the public hair on fire."
Seven decades from now, some triumphalist right-wing columnist for NYTimes Global Streaming 3-D Multimedia may look back on our times and note that another conservative commentator was better at popular etymology than political prognostication.
Snared by loopmanship
"Was an Official in the Loop?" asked a recent New York Times headline. Elisabeth Bumiller reported that when Vice President Dick Cheney said Richard Clarke had been "out of the loop" -- not privy to the highest-level meetings of Bush administration principals -- national security adviser Condoleezza Rice countered that "I would not use the words `out of the loop.'" Her view was that the counterterrorism executive was "in the loop," construing the "loop" to be a level below that of the top security officials. Cheney's precise statement was that Clarke "wasn't in the loop, frankly, on a lot of this stuff ... he clearly missed a lot of what was going on." Journalists changed the negative "wasn't in the loop" to a positive "out of the loop," to which Rice responded; the distinction is worth noting.
Tourists visiting downtown Chicago ask, "Where is the Loop?" That term refers to the railway built around Chicago's business district by Charles Tyson Yerkes, a figurative use of the word for "a circle formed by a rope." The Lexicographic Irregular John Strother of Princeton, N.J., holds that the current extension of the metaphor is rooted in the feedback theory of electrical engineers and automation pioneers.
In the current political vernacular, in the loop is "in the know" -- privy to information kept not only from the general public but also from all but the "inner circle" (shaped like a loop) of a specific enterprise. To be out of the loop is to be uninformed, a position in which no power player likes to appear.
But not always. During the 1980s Iran-contra scandal, when the Reagan administration diverted funds to combat communism in Latin America, Vice President George Herbert Walker Bush denied any knowledge of the scheme, memorably declaring that he had been out of the loop and was thus untainted.
When in the loop means "those around the power center," presidential aides assert their presence in the circle; when it suggests a conspiracy, out of the loop is the safe place to be.
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly widespread in workplaces, some people stand to benefit from the technology while others face lower wages and fewer job opportunities. However, from a longer-term perspective, as AI is applied more extensively to business operations, the personnel issue is not just about changes in job opportunities, but also about a structural mismatch between skills and demand. This is precisely the most pressing issue in the current labor market. Tai Wei-chun (戴偉峻), director-general of the Institute of Artificial Intelligence Innovation at the Institute for Information Industry, said in a recent interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times