When polling stations closed at 4pm on March 20, millions of anxious voters turned on their televisions and waited for the final results of the so-called "exit poll." TVBS failed to keep its promise of announcing its results at 4:01pm. Nevertheless, the media did not let viewers down.
At 4:30pm, more than 6 million ballots had been counted according to one local TV station, while others roused themselves to catch up.
Ten minutes later, the total number of counted ballots exceeded 8 million. The pan-blue camp took a lead according to most stations except FTV. Some seemed nervous while others seemed increasingly happy.
You would see a different picture if you had been watching PTS -- Public Television Service -- from the beginning. Citing numbers given by the campaign headquarters of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
PTS also simultaneously displayed the most authoritative numbers of counted votes announced by the Central Election Commission (CEC).
Although the commission's ballot counting was slow, it showed the tendency that Chen and Lu held a lead from very early on. However, all commercial stations had already speeded up counting to over 6 million votes for each camp, with Lien and Soong in the lead all the way. So what should they do? As a result, at the magical moment -- around a few minutes after 6pm -- they all began to report a Chen-Lu counterattack from the critical situation as the pan-green ticket suddenly took the lead. All the audience was stunned! How could the election situation have been reversed like this?
In fact, at 4:43pm, the station that speeded up the counted ballot numbers the most at one point had Lien and Soong with 7.32 million votes -- 2 million more than Chen and Lu. Although the number was quickly corrected later, that magical moment won the highest ratings of the night.
Moreover, TVBS, which held the very first nationwide exit poll for the election, finally announced the poll results around 5:30pm, giving Lien and Soong a 6 percent lead.
After the announcement, the station immediately expanded the lead of the Lien-Soong ticket even further.
I have heard that these stations have practiced this skill of exaggerating counted ballot numbers for years. They usually exaggerate the numbers of counted ballots at will in the early counting period, gradually changing the numbers to the real figures when the CEC's numbers catch up with theirs later.
The public would certainly like to forget these "miracles" if everything returns to normal after the election. We have been fooled by the media during past elections so many times anyway. But this time, some pan-blue legislators even cited the exit poll results as evidence of "vote-rigging."
Being misled by the media during the vote-counting process, the pan-blue supporters also refused to accept the final result and staged a protest. These stations' dirty "money game" has affected social stability after the election.
Shouldn't we ask them: who gave you the right to do so? When the entire society was being torn apart, we do have the right to demand an explanation from these stations.
Sylvia Feng is a television journalist.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under