Ruling and opposition party legislative caucuses finally reached a consensus on Wednesday to halve the number of legislative seats. For the first time, the Legislative Yuan is initiating a constitutional amendment, which, if successful, would be the nation's seventh constitutional amendment. This is indeed a great step forward for politics in this country. Although legislators were reluctant to support a reform which will cost many of them their jobs, election pressures left them no choice but to sign.
Downsizing the legislature and implementing a single-member district, double-ballot system are both measures that are long overdue. The number of legislative seats will be cut from 225 to 113, 34 of which will be held by legislators-at-large. The number of female or male lawmakers will be required to be at least 30 percent of the total. These measure will also help improve the quality of lawmakers, since those marginal legislators who have specialized in eccentric measures to attract the support of a mere 5 percent or 10 percent of voters in an electoral district will not be re-elected. This will also consolidate and deepen party politics and greatly improve the nation's political culture.
Two important questions, however, remain.
First, are the parties really serious about passing this constitutional amendment? Will they pass it before the presidential election or will it be put aside until after the election? Government and opposition finally agreed to the reform plan, but their political concerns are all too obvious. Aside from responding to advocates of legislative reform, the rush to pass the proposal before polling day also stems from the parties' electoral concerns.
Viewing legislative reform as its main battlefield, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) demanded an extraordinary legislative session next week to deal with the proposal. To avoid being attacked over the legislative reform issue, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the People First Party rushed to sign the document and emphasize that they supported the guaranteed quota for women. The Taiwan Solidarity Union made a U-turn to support the single-member district system. Will their promises remain valid after pressure is removed?
Second, is this the proper process for a constitutional amendment? Will the mere promotion of legislative election reform achieve the goal of a thorough reform of the government? A review of the process on Wednesday indicates that all involved were hasty and slipshod, but any effort to amend the Constitution should be carried out according to the strictest standards.
According to the spirit of Council of Grand Justices Interpretation No. 499, a review committee should call a public hearing to hear public and scholarly opinions on a constitutional amendment, allow the legislators proposing the amendment to explain their reasoning and proceed from a general debate to debating each article in order to give the issue thorough treatment. These steps are missing.
The parties have either overlooked or put aside accompanying issues that also require legislation such as whether the right to unseat the Cabinet and dissolve the legislature should remain once legislators' terms have been extended to the same length as the presidential term. Rushing legislative reform prior to the presidential election will create constitutionally-related problems, and this is not good from a long-term legal perspective.
Legislative reform should be initiated as soon as possible, but the constitutional amendment process requires great care and continuity. The piecemeal approach of previous amendments must not be repeated, or it would be better to write a new constitution in 2006. The people are monitoring the ability of all the parties to deliver on their legislative reform promise.
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
I wrote this before US President Donald Trump embarked on his uneventful state visit to China on Thursday. So, I shall confine my observations to the joint US-Philippine military exercise of April 20 through May 8, known collectively as “Balikatan 2026.” This year’s Balikatan was notable for its “firsts.” First, it was conducted primarily with Taiwan in mind, not the Philippines or even the South China Sea. It also showed that in the Pacific, America’s alliance network is still robust. Allies are enthusiastic about America’s renewed leadership in the region. Nine decades ago, in 1936, America had neither military strength
RSS