Three social elites -- Academia Sinica President Lee Yuan-tseh (李遠哲), Cloud Gate Dance Theater founder Lin Hwai-min (林懷民) and Formosa Plastics Group chairman Wang Yung-ching (王永慶) -- published a "solemn statement" regarding the presidential election in a front-page newspaper advertisement in mid-January.
Unfortunately, some media intentionally misrepresented the ad as a condemnation of negative campaigning meant to protect the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-People First Party alliance from its troubles with the issue of party and private assets.
But is negative campaigning necessarily bad for an election campaign that has no positive meaning?
Campaign attacks are carried out in two ways.
The first is called image attack -- for example, attacking the KMT's corruption and the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) pro-Taiwan independence stance, as well as calling other candidates feeble, corrupt or capricious. An image attack is usually made up of accusations against personal characteristics, made to entrench voters' preconceived ideas.
The second type is called issue attack -- attacking opponents' political accomplishments or policies or stances on specific issues. Examples of this are the KMT's criticism of the DPP's referendum proposal and the latter's criticism of the former's party assets.
The accusations in such negative ads have clarified various problems, and have made parties and their candidates unable to hide, echoing the social elite's call for resuming "rationality and clearness."
Through the KMT's attacks, we can think over the meaning and necessity of holding a preventive referendum on election day.
Through the DPP's attacks, we can understand how the KMT inappropriately obtained national assets that originally belonged to the people.
Through the attacks of both, we can have a clear picture of the two presidential candidates' wealth.
The quantity of their wealth is not the key point. What matters is whether illegitimate conduct occurred.
In addition, through a comparison of the negative ads in this election and in the previous presidential election, perhaps voters can also see the drastic changes in the attitudes of some politicians.
Thanks to negative ads, voters are able to view the two candidates more rationally.
Elections are always accompanied by negative campaigning. During the 1998 Taipei mayoral election campaign, the KMT's Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) attacked President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), who was Taipei mayor at the time, with negative television ads regarding the city's parking and robbery problems.
Regardless of whether his points of view were right or wrong, they were very clever negative ads that calmly took aim at specific issues.
Negative campaigning should not be vicious. In the 1997 local government chief elections, the KMT attacked Sisy Chen (
Also, negative campaigning should not attack humanity.
It is wrong for the KMT to attack Chen's grandson in its ad. All grandsons are precious in the eyes of their grandparents.
KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
The martial-law era has ended. It is precisely through negative campaigning that we can tear off candidates' masks so that the truth can be shown.
As for the rest, it will be judged by voters.
Cheng Tzu-leong is a professor in the advertising department at National Chengchi University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the