When the Web-based political group MoveOn.org announced a contest in October for homemade commercials challenging the Bush administration -- the winner to be shown on TV during the week of the State of the Union address -- grass-roots America proved a willing and eager advertising agency.
Thirty-second spots poured in by the hundreds in e-mail attachments to MoveOn.org, which has already shown that the Internet can be a battering ram for political activism by organizing protests against the invasion of Iraq. Last week, the group posted 1,017 of the amateur commercials on a Web site (www.bushin30seconds.org), asking viewers to pick their favorites.
In the first hour of polling on Wednesday last week, more than 5,700 votes were logged. So many people visited the site that MoveOn, experiencing bandwidth problems, limited the curious to 20 ads a day.
Next month the top vote-getters will be shown to a panel of left-leaning celebrity judges including Moby, Michael Moore, Janeane Garofalo, Margaret Cho and Gus Van Sant, with one or more winning entries to be broadcast as paid advertisements in Washington, in potential swing states or perhaps nationally.
What the cascade of entries demonstrates is that the home-movie revolution made possible by inexpensive digital camcorders and off-the-shelf software has elevated the US from merely being a nation of wedding videographers.
Even so, the production values of many spots are a bit shaky, and the content often overheated. Bush Cheney Auto World, a typical entry from Houston high-school history teacher Tracy Spaight, posits an oily salesman whose motto is: "Where we always say what you want to hear."
But a number of the ads are unexpectedly professional-looking, at least on a par with the burnished style and hard-hitting messages of political ads made by Madison Avenue pros or K Street consultants in untucked shirttails.
The amateur ad makers of the left are charged up about the country's dependence on fossil fuels, the plight of education and the US$87.5 billion spending package for Iraq. They tabulate Bush's perceived deceptions. He is "Bushoccio," an inflatable Hot Air President Doll whose box bears the product warning: "Not designed for poor people. Not actually elected."
Contributors to the contest include recent graduates of the Kennedy School of Government, a teacher from Detroit, stand-up comics, amateur impressionists, a DJ and more than a few self-styled rappers.
Sets and props have a quaintly home-grown provenance. Pies and cakes are used to illustrate budget and tax cuts. A pot on the verge of boiling over is Iraq. Water gurgling down a drain is American Credibility. A toilet flushes away Our Children's Future, played in another ad by a fragile US Grade-A egg.
Movies and TV shows are the ad makers' grist.
"I'm concerned, George, I'm concerned about how you've dealt with the economy," drones a computer in a spot titled 2004: A Political Odyssey.
Christopher Fink, an independent filmmaker in California, used his ranch-style house in the San Fernando Valley as a set and recruited his sister as cinematographer after she made an accomplished video of his wife's baby shower.
In the spot titled If Parents Acted Like Bush, Fink plays the president as a cad who beds down with special interests. His car pulls away from the house in the morning, leaving his teenage daughter, played by Fink's niece, to find her own way to school. He buys a motorcycle and tells the Terminator-face biker that his daughter will pay for it.
Then she walks in on him in his bedroom, snuggling with a blonde who isn't her mother.
"It's OK," he cries, "she's rich!"
And how much did the spot cost?
"Including catering? That was most of the budget -- the doughnuts," Fink said.
"It couldn't have cost me more than 50 bucks," he said.
Donnie Deutsch, a prominent New York advertising executive who worked on the campaign of Bill Clinton in 1992, looked at a sample of the MoveOn ads last week and said he was impressed.
"I thought some of it was very fresh and interesting -- obviously amateurish in some of its creative license -- but certainly very creative in its thinking," he said.
However, Mike Murphy, a Republican strategist who worked on Arnold Schwarzenegger's campaign for governor of California, was more dismissive.
"I'd say a lot of this looks like MoveOn self-promotion," he said in a message sent, appropriately enough, by e-mail over his BlackBerry. "Having an insult-the-president home-movie contest is not smart politics," he said.
Through its voter fund, which solicits donations online, in part from Web surfers who must register to view the anti-Bush ads, MoveOn aims to raise about $15 million for advertising in battleground states to unseat Bush, said Eli Pariser, who oversees the group's fund-raising.
In addition to the amateur ads, MoveOn has a professional agency on retainer. But Pariser said he was so pleased with the ads that have rolled in that MoveOn may approach its 1.7 million members in this country and say, "Here are 10 great ads, and we want to run all of them."
It would not be the first time the group has proven the power of the Internet for political activism. Founded five years ago to oppose the impeachment of President Bill Clinton, MoveOn.org became a catalyst for demonstrations earlier this year, and subsequently raised more than US$7 million from 133,000 donors to oppose Bush's policies. Last month, two billionaire philanthropists, George Soros and Peter Lewis, announced they would match contributions to the group up to US$5 million between them.
The content of the MoveOn ads is circumscribed by the campaign finance reforms of the McCain-Feingold Law, upheld earlier this month by the Supreme Court. While prohibiting soft-money donations to political parties, the law allows donations to flow to independent groups like MoveOn as long they run only informational ads and do not specifically endorse a candidate.
Thus MoveOn's call for submissions was careful to solicit ads that would help voters "understand the truth about George Bush." No ads supporting the president's policies were sent in, contest organizers noted. They also disqualified about 100 submissions, including some for reasons of taste. A spot showing a frog dropped into boiling water, a metaphor for "how the administration is turning up the heat in this country," according to its director, was deemed unsuitable for TV.
Still, plenty of the ads that made the cut exhibit the inflamed passions of street rallies. The scenarios are sometimes closer to angry guerrilla theater than witty Saturday Night Live spoofs. A man fills his gas tank, then shoots the cashier instead of paying.
"If you wouldn't tolerate this from a normal citizen," the screen reads, "why would you from your president?"
Follow the Leader compares Bush to a schoolyard bully who shoots a schoolmate in the back. Connect the Dots maintains that Bush "has established links to known terrorist organizations." Still another commercial claims he has "ties to the bin Laden family."
Larry McCarthy, a Republican strategist who in 1988 helped produce a notorious TV ad using a convicted murderer, Willie Horton, to suggest that the Democratic nominee, Governor Michael Dukakis, was soft on crime, has not seen the MoveOn ads, but he admired the idea.
"It's certainly proof of the march of technology, letting everybody and anybody be an ad maker," he said.
"As a fund-raiser gimmick, I think it's pretty good," he continued.
"I wouldn't be surprised if somebody on the Republican side decided that there's just as much or more fodder on Howard Dean, so why don't you let those little Republicans with camcorders have a go at it too?" he added.
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
On Sunday, 13 new urgent care centers (UCC) officially began operations across the six special municipalities. The purpose of the centers — which are open from 8am to midnight on Sundays and national holidays — is to reduce congestion in hospital emergency rooms, especially during the nine-day Lunar New Year holiday next year. It remains to be seen how effective these centers would be. For one, it is difficult for people to judge for themselves whether their condition warrants visiting a major hospital or a UCC — long-term public education and health promotions are necessary. Second, many emergency departments acknowledge
US President Donald Trump’s seemingly throwaway “Taiwan is Taiwan” statement has been appearing in headlines all over the media. Although it appears to have been made in passing, the comment nevertheless reveals something about Trump’s views and his understanding of Taiwan’s situation. In line with the Taiwan Relations Act, the US and Taiwan enjoy unofficial, but close economic, cultural and national defense ties. They lack official diplomatic relations, but maintain a partnership based on shared democratic values and strategic alignment. Excluding China, Taiwan maintains a level of diplomatic relations, official or otherwise, with many nations worldwide. It can be said that
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
RSS