Flies have been around for at least 250 million years, surviving global warming and freezing and major "extinction events" such as that which wiped out the dinosaurs. Yet we know surprisingly little about this constant and frequently irritating companion to man and animal life.
In an attempt to rectify this, Australian scientists have joined a global effort to map the genetic structure and evolutionary history of the fly which could also entail a major rethink of Darwinian principles. One of them, David Yeates, an entomologist, describes the task as "an incredibly important project considering flies comprise about 10 percent of animal life forms on the planet."
Yeates and John Oakshott, a molecular biologist, are directing a US$2.4 million grant from America's National Science Foundation for Australian participation in the study, which also includes US, Canadian and Singaporean teams. Their job is to bring together field research in the coming fly-ridden Australian summer and recover the fossil records going back millions of years of flies preserved in amber, shale and ancient layers of marine sediments.
ILLUSTRATION: MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
"It is difficult but not impossible to recover data from flies that have been dead for a few hundred million years," Yeates says.
"In some cases, they left behind hard casings or exo-skeletal remains, and in others we even see internal organs containing traces of DNA. With very well preserved flies or those we catch alive, electron microscopy is yielding detail that would have eluded scrutiny until recent advances in medical or forensic technology," he says.
A favorite saying of Yeates is that "a big part of biodiversity is actually `flyodiversity.' Of nearly 2 million living species known to science, and with many more yet to be identified, around one-tenth are flies or `diptera' of some sort," he adds.
Diptera, a large order of insects having a single pair of wings and a sucking or piercing mouthpart, includes flies, mosquitoes, gnats and midges.
Yeates estimates there are up to 40,000 distinct species of flies in Australia alone, although only 8,000 of them have been scientifically described and named. When the five-year international project is completed it expects to have grouped between 200,000 to 400,000 types of flies into at least 150 distinct families.
"There are major practical implications from knowing our flies better," Yeates says. "They have been around for at least 250 million years, appearing well before the dinosaurs and surviving periods of global warming, global freezing and major extinction events that saw many species, including the dinosaurs, cut down at the seeming height of their powers. So we know that by studying their genetic make-up we may learn more about their capacity to adapt to shocks that destroyed other life forms."
But the benefit of mapping fly DNA goes much further, because the fly genome has enough in common with the human genome to help decode the more complex genetic makeup of mankind. Being simpler, it is also much better understood in species like the common brown fly found everywhere except in the most extreme southern polar environments.
"When we see something unknown in the human genome we can often get clues to its purpose by computer matching a similar genetic structure in a type of fly where that particular molecular combination already has a known function," Yeates says.
Oakshott's major role in the project is to examine the genes that are making some modern flies resistant to the pesticides used in agriculture. Finding out whether those genes have lain dormant for aeons before being "turned on" by a dose of fly spray, or evolved as an instantaneous defense mechanism in flies in the last 100 years is one of the biggest riddles in the study of evolution.
"This is a crucial question because it is asked of all species of animal," Yeates says. "If we discover that the environmental stresses caused by the rise of humans can cause the instantaneous origination of new species of flies then a lot of things that are accepted about evolution will need revision."
Already the world's farms -- where pesticide-resistant flies are breeding better than those that didn't adapt -- are looking like a case study from journals of the 19th century naturalist Charles Darwin, who first described the evolution of species as a coherent scientific theory.
The Australian part of the fly study will be incorporated in a National Science Foundation "Tree of Life" electronic databank and a web site run by the US Department of Agriculture in Washington.
"This is where the continuing practical benefits of the work will become apparent," Yeates says. "It means there will be an open source of information available for use by agricultural or medical researchers, where the answers to their questions may have been buzzing around their heads without being recognized."
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS